Solving a Difficult Equation After 20 Years: Tips and Tricks for Success

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jrbigfish
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a second-order linear homogeneous differential equation, specifically the equation y'' + 2y' + 4y = 0. Participants explore various methods for finding the roots of the characteristic equation and the implications for the general solution of the differential equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in solving the equation after a long absence from school and seeks help with the characteristic equation.
  • Another participant suggests using the quadratic formula to find the roots of the characteristic equation, providing the formula and a specific example.
  • Some participants discuss the process of completing the square as an alternative method for solving the quadratic equation.
  • There is confusion regarding the correct form of the roots, with one participant questioning the notation and another clarifying it.
  • Participants explore the implications of the roots on the form of the solution, discussing underdamped solutions and the use of exponential and trigonometric functions in the general solution.
  • There is a back-and-forth regarding the correct representation of the solution, with some participants correcting each other on the use of imaginary numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of the quadratic formula and the nature of the roots, but there is some disagreement and confusion regarding the notation and the final form of the solution. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of the final expression for the general solution.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the notation used for the roots and the transition from the characteristic equation to the general solution. Some participants express uncertainty about the correct form of the solution and the implications of the imaginary components.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in differential equations, particularly those returning to the subject after a long absence, may find this discussion helpful.

jrbigfish
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I hope my posting is not against the rules.
The equation is not that difficult but I had being out of school for 20 years.

y"+2y'+4y=0 Then I do
r^2+2r+4=0
then you can not do
(r+2)(r+2)=0 because do not work. can I have some help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi jrbigfish! Fishy welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
jrbigfish said:
r^2+2r+4=0
then you can not do
(r+2)(r+2)=0 because do not work. can I have some help please?

use good ol' (-b ± √(b2 - 4ac))/2a …

in this case -1 ± i√3. :wink:
we need more fish! :biggrin:
 
Most polynomial equations cannot be factored (with integer coefficients). Complete the square or use the quadratic formula.

Completing the square:
r^2+ 2r+ 4= r^2+ 2r+ 1- 1+ 4= r^2+ 2r+ 1+ 3= (r+1)^2+ 3= 0

Quadratic formula:
r= \frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2- 4ac}}{2a}
with a= 1, b= 2, c= 4.
 
Ok the quadratic formula! Yes! But what is this roots of the characteristic equation are
r1,2=-a+/-(a^2-b)^1/2 what is this and when I use it?
 
jrbigfish said:
Ok the quadratic formula! Yes! But what is this roots of the characteristic equation are
r1,2=-a+/-(a^2-b)^1/2 what is this and when I use it?

Do you mean r1,2 = -a ± √(a2 - b) ?

hmm :rolleyes: … that looks like the roots of x2 +2ax + b = 0.

I'd forget that formula if I were you.
 
Ok thank you mag.
 
Ok after I use the quadratic formula (-2+/-((12))^1/2)/2 which solves 0.732i and -2.73i. So the solution is of the form underdamped. So I use the equation y=e^(∝x) (C_1 cosβx+C_2 sinβx). then what?
 
jrbigfish said:
Ok after I use the quadratic formula (-2+/-((12))^1/2)/2 which solves 0.732i and -2.73i.

(copy the ± and √ symbols)

Nooo … that's i(-1 ± √3) … you should have got -1 ± i√3. :redface:
 
Ok -1 ± i√3 then what I do?
 
  • #10
jrbigfish said:
Ok -1 ± i√3 then what I do?

?? :confused:

you solve y' = (-1 ± i√3)y.
 
  • #11
so we end with y=Ce^(1±√3)t ?
 
  • #12
jrbigfish said:
so we end with y=Ce^(1±√3)t ?

what happened to i? :confused:
 
  • #13
so we end with y=Ce^(1±i√3)t ?? Help me here it has being 12 years after the B.S. is this correct?
 
  • #14
(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
jrbigfish said:
so we end with y=Ce^(1±i√3)t ??

Sort of, but you won't get many marks if you write it like that.

e(1±i√3)t = ete±i√3t,

so the general solution is … ? :smile:
 
  • #15
Hi jrbigfish! Thanks for the PM. :smile:

The general solution will be Aetei√3t + Bete-i√3t

though it would be more usual (and much easier if the solutions are going to be real anyway) to write it in the form Aetcos√3t + Betsin√3t :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K