Solving a Kinematics Problem: Throwing a Ball to Clear a Peaked Roof

AI Thread Summary
To determine the initial speed required for a ball to clear a peaked roof, the problem involves kinematic equations and energy principles. The initial calculation of velocity as \(\sqrt{2gh}\) was incorrect because it assumed zero speed at height h. The correct approach involves recognizing that the vertical speed at the peak is zero while horizontal motion continues. By applying the formula for maximum height and range, the correct initial speed is found to be \(\sqrt{5/2gh}\). This solution highlights the importance of considering both vertical and horizontal components in projectile motion.
Nishikino Maki
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A peaked roof is symmetrical and subtends a right angle, as shown. Standing at a height of distance h below the peak, with what initial speed must a ball be thrown so that it just clears the peak and hits the other side of the roof at the same height?

Diagram: http://imgur.com/bi1efMm

Homework Equations


x=vcos(\theta)t
y=vsin(\theta)t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2
\frac{1}{2}mv^2=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


This is supposed to be a kinematics problem, but I wasn't too sure how to do it that way so I used energy principles. Using the above equation, I got that the velocity should be \sqrt{2gh} by simply rearranging the variables, however, the answer key says that it's \sqrt{5/2gh}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nishikino Maki said:
... I used energy principles. Using the above equation, I got that the velocity should be \sqrt{2gh} ...
That equation you used is wrong. It assumes the speed is zero when the height is h.

Give it another shot, then explain your thinking.
 
Does it have something to do with how the vertical speed is 0 but it is still moving horizontally? In that case the vertical speed at the bottom would be \sqrt(2gh), and the horizontal would be (by working backwards from the answer) \sqrt(1/2gh).
 
Nishikino Maki said:
the vertical speed is 0 but it is still moving horizontally?
Yes.
Nishikino Maki said:
and the horizontal would be (by working backwards from the answer) ##\sqrt{\frac 1{2gh}}##.
That would have dimension 1/speed, so cannot be right.
Knowing the vertical launch speed, how long does it take to reach the top? How far has it moved horizontally in that time?
 
Sorry for bad formatting, I meant \sqrt(1/2) * \sqrt(gh).

I decided to do the problem a different way, I used the formula for max height and max range, set max height to half of max range, and solved for the angle. From there I was able to get the max height, which indeed was \sqrt(5/2)\sqrt(gh). Thanks for your help.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top