Solving a linear set of unknown Vectors

AI Thread Summary
To solve a linear set of vector equations like Ax + By = P and Cx + Dy = Q, it is essential to understand the nature of the vectors involved. When A, B, C, D, x, and y are all Nx1 vectors, the operation Ax represents a matrix-vector multiplication rather than an inner product. This leads to a system of equations that can be underdetermined if there are more unknowns than equations. Standard procedures for solving such systems include using techniques like matrix inversion or numerical methods, depending on the specific context and properties of the matrices involved. Clarifying the dimensionality and relationships of the vectors is crucial for finding a solution.
m26k9
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to find a mathematical procedure for finding the solutions for a linear set of vector equations.

For example I have;

Ax + By = P (1)
Cx + Dy = Q (2)

Here, A,B,C,D,x and y are all Nx1 vectors. So I need to solve for two Nx1 vectors.
For a general linear equations like Ax=B -> x=A^-1.B, is there any standard procedure to solve for vectors of unknowns?

Thank you very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If A and x are column (?) vectors, then what is Ax? Is it the inner product?
Because in that case, you have two equations for 2N unknowns which will give you a heavily underdetermined system.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top