Solving a Pool Leak: Calculating Inches Lost Per Hour

  • Thread starter Thread starter xowe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lost Per
xowe
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello, again. I have a question problem, fairly simple, that I have most likely done wrong. It is about a pool leak.

When the pools water pump is on, from 3:50pm to 10:10am the pool lost 2.25in.

When the pump was turned off from 10:10am, to 1:50pm, it lost 7/8 in. They want to know how many inches are lost every hour. Here's how I did it.

(When water to the pools pumpe is on, from 3:50pm to 10:10am the pool lost 2.25in.)
3:50-10:10= 7hr. 2.25 divided by 7 right? And the same with the other?...xowe
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It seems to me a lot easier than you make it.
First, from 3:50 pm to 10:10 am is NOT 7 hours: it is 18 hours and 20 minutes.

From 3:50pm to 10:10am the pump is on (Am I to assume that the pump is actually pumping water into the pool and not just recirculating it?- otherwise the pump is really irrelevant.) so there are two reasons for the level of water to change: change= I- O where "I" is the water pumped in (in "inches per hour") and O is the water flowing out because of the leak (also in "inches per hour")- you have
I- O= 2.25in/18.33 hrs= 0.147 in/hr. From 10:10 am to 1:50 pm, a period of 3 hours and 40 min (= 3.67 hrs) the pump was turned off so the only reason for the change in height, 7/8 in, is the leak itself:
O= (7/8 in)/(3.67 hr)= .24 in/hr.
"They want to know how many inches are lost every hour." I assume those two numbers are the answers you want.

Another possibility is that they want the average over the whole time period. To do that you would not that there was a total of
2.25+ 7/8= 2.25+ 0.875= 3.125 inches in a total of 22 hours. The average rate of drop is 3.125/22= 0.142 in/hour.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top