MHB Solving a system of linear equations with one unknown value

exqiron
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Determine the values of a for which the following system of linear equations has no solutions, a unique solution, or infinitely many solutions. You can select 'always', 'never', 'a = ', or 'a ≠', then specify a value or comma-separated list of values.

3x1+6x2 = −6
3x1+9x2−6x3 = −12
x1+x2+ax3 = 1No Solutions: ?
Unique Solution: ?
Infinitely Many Solutions: ?

all i could conclude from this was
1 1 a 1
0 1 -2 -2
0 0 (2-a) -1
don't know what to do next i have tried different questions, don't understand :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exqiron said:
Determine the values of a for which the following system of linear equations has no solutions, a unique solution, or infinitely many solutions. You can select 'always', 'never', 'a = ', or 'a ≠', then specify a value or comma-separated list of values.

3x1+6x2 = −6
3x1+9x2−6x3 = −12
x1+x2+ax3 = 1No Solutions: ?
Unique Solution: ?
Infinitely Many Solutions: ?

all i could conclude from this was
1 1 a 1
0 1 -2 -2
0 0 (2-a) -1
don't know what to do next i have tried different questions, don't understand :/

To start with, you can find where you are going to have unique solutions by evaluating the determinant of your coefficient matrix. For all values of a that give a nonzero determinant, you will have unique solutions.
 
Prove It said:
To start with, you can find where you are going to have unique solutions by evaluating the determinant of your coefficient matrix. For all values of a that give a nonzero determinant, you will have unique solutions.

so in other words if i write this is this correct?
No solutions: when a = 2
Unique solution: when a not equal to 2
Infinite Many solutions: Never
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top