Solving A Trignometric Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrueStar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric equation cos(2x)(2cos(x)+1)=0 in the interval [0, 2π]. The solutions are derived by setting cos(2x)=0 and 2cos(x)+1=0, leading to four solutions for cos(2x) due to its shorter period, while cos(x) yields two solutions. The correct solutions for cos(2x)=0 are x=π/4, 3π/4, 5π/4, and 7π/4, while for 2cos(x)+1=0, the solutions are x=2π/3 and 4π/3. Clarifications on notation and the importance of visualizing the functions were also discussed, enhancing understanding of the problem. Overall, the calculations and reasoning align with the properties of trigonometric functions.
TrueStar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find all solutions to the equation in the interval [0,2\pi] algebraically.

cos2x(2cos+1)=0

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I've done, but I don't think it's right. I set cos2x=0 and 2cos+1=0. Since cos2x is a multi-angle, I let t=2x and rewrote it as cost=0 That means t equals \pi\2+n\pi.

That also means 2x=\pi\2+n\pi. After dividing out the 2, I get x=\pi\4+n\pi\2.

I get the answers \pi\4, 3\pi\4, 5\pi\4, and 7\pi\4. This doesn't seem right to me. Shouldn't I only get two answers.

The other one seems easier. I got cosx by itself and it is cosx=-1\2. That means x is equal to 2\pi\3 and 4\pi\3.

Am I doing this correctly?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pi symbols aren't supposed to be raised up like that. It's just pi; sorry about that.
 
cosx=0 has two solutions, but you have four solutions to cos2x=0. That 2 multiplied with the x in cos2x makes its period only half as long as that of cosx, going from a period of 2\pi to \pi
cosx=0 has just two solutions in [0, \pi], so cos2x=0 should have twice as many solutions, because it now goes through two periods in [0, \pi].

Hopefully this doesn't make it more complicated for you. You can also look at the graph of cos2x to see that there are four solutions in [0, \pi].


Instead of the [ tex ] tags, you can use [ itex ] where the LaTeX fits better within other text like you have. Also, your division lines should be going the other way. For example, \pi/4
 
Thank you for you reply! I plugged in the equations separately, and then as the original equation. It really helped visualize what was going on and I could double check using the trace function. I did not think to try this before. It all makes sense now!

I'll try to clean up my tags and symbols; thanks for the tips.
 
?? What does "2cos+1" mean? Is that supposed to be "2cos(x)+ 1"?
If the problem is to solve cos(2x)(2cos(x)+ 1)= 0 then, yes, either cos(2x)= 0 or 2cos(x)+ 1= 0. cosine is 0, in the interval [0, 2\pi] only for 0 and 2\pi so you have 2x= 0 and 2x= 2\pi as roots.

2cos(x)+ 1= 0 gives cos(x)= -1/2. Think about dividing an equilateral triangle in half.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's supposed to be 2cos(x)+1. I'm sorry, I mistyped it. I calculated the problem correctly and Bohrok helped me understand why x has twice as many solutions for cos(2x)=0.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top