Solving Algebra Problem: [3+ x5/3y]/x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imparcticle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Bit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying the algebraic expression [3 + x^(5/3)y] / x^(2/3). Participants point out errors in the initial steps of factoring and simplifying, particularly regarding the extraction of x^(1/3) and the correct handling of powers. One contributor suggests factoring out x^(2/3) from the numerator to simplify the expression correctly. The final simplified form is presented as (3 + xyx^2) / x. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful manipulation of exponents in algebraic expressions.
Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
I'm not sure how to do this:

[3x-1/3 + x5/3y] / x2/3

this is what i did:

[3 + x5/3y ]/ x1/3x2/3

[3+ x5/3y]/x

the answer to the problem is the same as what I have except instead of x^5/3, its x^2.

help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course it is.Put it like that:

\frac{\frac{3}{x^{\frac{1}{3}}}+x^{\frac{5}{3}}y}{x^{\frac{2}{3}}}

Do you see where that x^{2} is coming from...?

Daniel.
 
Your 1.step, that is, extracting x^{-\frac{1}{3}} from the parenthesis has been done incorrectly.
Try to figure out why.
 
u can take x^2/3 in factor for the numerator, u will have:

[x^2/3(3x^-1 +xy)]/x^2/3

then u simplify and obtain

3/x + xy

which leads to (3 + yx^2)/x
 
Of course it is.Put it like that:



Do you see where that x^{2} is coming from...?

no.
Your 1.step, that is, extracting from the parenthesis has been done incorrectly.
Try to figure out why.

I don't see it.

u can take x^2/3 in factor for the numerator, u will have:

[x^2/3(3x^-1 +xy)]/x^2/3
how are you factoring a x^2/3 when the smallest power is -1/3 ? if you factor that out, x^5/3 should be x^1/3.


help.
 
\frac{\frac{3}{x^{\frac{1}{3}}} + x^{\frac{5}{3}}y}{x^{\frac{2}{3}}} = { \left( \frac{3}{x^{\frac{1}{3}}} + x^{\frac{5}{3}}y \right) \over x^{\frac{2}{3}}}\cdot \frac{x^{\frac{1}{3}}}{x^{\frac{1}{3}}} = \frac{3 + x^2y}{x}

I only posted this because I think you're getting more confused by the replies so far. Try to take a lesson from the method I used to simplify (that is, multiplying by 1 is a good idea sometimes!).
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top