Solving Algebraic Expressions: Confused with One Step | Need Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter vande060
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving two algebraic expressions related to a Doppler effect problem. The first expression, 1.052 = (1-x/340)/(1+x/340), can be simplified by multiplying both sides by the denominator and then by 340, leading to a linear equation. The second expression, 200 = [4000/(1-x/340)] - [4000/(1+x/340)], requires careful attention to the fractions and can be tackled by multiplying by the least common denominator. Participants confirm that the first expression yields a solution of approximately -8.616 for x. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting and manipulating algebraic fractions to arrive at the solution.
vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



this is a step I ran across in a Doppler effect problem, it might be late but I just don't know why I am stumped here

there are two different, routes I can take with this problem and they both give me expressions I don't know how to solve. I would like to know how to solve them both, so I will post both. thank you for your time

1.052 = (1-x/340)/(1 + x/340)

and

200 = [4000/(1-x/340)] - [4000/(1+x/340)]

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



ive done the rest of the problem, just don't get this step. is it a quadratic maybe?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So is the 1st one this?
1.052 = \frac{1-x/340}{1 + x/340}

If so, multiply both sides by the denominator, then multiply both sides by 340. You should then have a linear equation with no fractions.

For the 2nd, please double check your typing. Does the 1st 4000 have a slash afterward and the 2nd 4000 doesn't?
 
eumyang said:
So is the 1st one this?
1.052 = \frac{1-x/340}{1 + x/340}

If so, multiply both sides by the denominator, then multiply both sides by 340. You should then have a linear equation with no fractions.

For the 2nd, please double check your typing. Does the 1st 4000 have a slash afterward and the 2nd 4000 doesn't?

second one should too sorry, i will edit now

1.052 + 1.052x/340 = 1-x/340

357.68 + 1.052x = 340 - x

x = -8.615 right?
 
Last edited:
vande060 said:
second one should too sorry, i will edit now

1.052 + 1.052x/340 = 1-x/340

357.68 + 1.052x = 340 - x

x = -8.615 right?

Well, my rounded answer was -8.616, but that assumes that 1.052 is not rounded.

So, does the 2nd one look like this?
200 = \frac{4000}{1-x/340} - \frac{4000}{1+x/340}

If so, I would start by multiplying each fraction by 340/340. Then multiply both sides of the equation by the LCD of the two denominators.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top