B Solving an Integral on a Spherical Surface - Tips

victorneto
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I ask for solution help from the integral below, where y and x represent angles in a metric of a spherical, 2-D surface. He was studying how to obtain the geodesic curves on the spherical surface, the sphere of radius r = 1, to simplify. The integral is the end result. It is enough, now, to integrate, to obtain the equation of the geodesics in such surface. It happens that I could not solve the integral, for which I used all the methods I know (there must be some that I do not know ...), with no results. I then used Mathematica (Wolfram Alpha), but the answer is a very complex, unintelligible equation. At least for me.$$Δy=∫1/Sin[x]*Sqrt[k^-2*Sin[x]^2-1]$$

Could anyone indicate any tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you clearly define the integral you want to solve? It's hard to make sense of your formula above.

It's of course not very smart to use spherical coordinates to get the geodesics on a sphere. Cartesian coordinates with the obvious holonomous constraint are much more convenient (which admittedly is unintuitive since spherical coordinates seem "natural" to describe a sphere, which is why they are called "spherical" in the first place ;-))).

The geodesics on the sphere follow from the Lagrangian
$$L=\frac{1}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 - \frac{\lambda}{2} (\vec{x}^2-1),$$
where ##\vec{x} \in \mathbb{R}^3##, and ##\lambda## is the Lagrange parameter for the constraint, ##\vec{x}^2=1##.

The canonical momenta are
$$\vec{p}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\vec{x}}}=\dot{\vec{x}}$$
and the geodesic is thus given by
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\ddot{\vec{x}}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \vec{x}}=-\lambda \vec{x}. \qquad (1)$$
To determine ##\lambda## we take the 2nd deriviative of the contraint equation
$$\vec{x}^2=1 \; \Rightarrow \; \vec{x} \cdot \dot{\vec{x}}=0 \; \Rightarrow \; \dot{\vec{x}}^2 + \vec{x} \cdot \ddot{\vec{x}}=0.$$
With the equation of motion (1) we get
$$\dot{\vec{x}}^2-\lambda \vec{x}^2=\dot{\vec{x}}^2-1=0. \qquad (2)$$
Further we have the "Hamiltonian" of the variational principle as a conserved quantity since the Lagrangian doesn't depend explicitly on "time":
$$H=\vec{p} \cdot \dot{\vec{x}}-L=\frac{1}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 + \frac{\lambda}{2} (\vec{x}^2-1) = \frac{1}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2=\text{const}.$$
We can choose the constant to be ##1## by just rescaling the independent parameter ##t##. BTW: This is the advantage of the "square form" of the Lagrangian for the geodesics, because it always automatically makes the curve parameter an affine parameter for the geodesic. So we have ##\dot{\vec{x}}^2=1## and thus using this in (2) gives ##\lambda=1##. Plugging this into (1) finally gives
$$\ddot{\vec{x}}=-\vec{x}.$$
The general solution of this obviously is
$$\vec{x}(t)=\vec{A} \cos t + \vec{B} \sin t.$$
The constraint tells us that
$$\vec{x}^2=1 \; \Rightarrow \; \dot{\vec{x}} \cdot \vec{x}=0 \; \Rightarrow \; (\vec{A} \cos t +\vec{B} \sin t)(-\vec{A} \sin t + \vec{B} \cos t) = (\vec{B}^2- \vec{A}^2) \sin t \cos t + \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B} (\cos^2 t - \sin^2 t)=\frac{1}{2} (\vec{B}^2-\vec{A}^2) \sin(2 t) + \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B} \cos(2 t)=0.$$
Setting ##t=0## implies ##\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}=0##. Setting ##t=\pi/4## yields ##|\vec{A}|=|\vec{B}|##.

This means that ##\vec{A}## and ##\vec{B}## are two perpendicular vectors of equal length ##\ell##. Defining thus ##\vec{e}_1=\vec{A}/\ell## and ##\vec{e}_2 = \vec{B}/\ell## and ##\vec{e}_3=\vec{e}_1 \times \vec{e}_2## one has a Cartesian coodinate system, where the geodesic reads
$$\vec{x}=\ell \begin{pmatrix} \cos t \\ \sin t \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$
Employing once more the constraint ##\vec{x}^2=1## gives ##\ell 1##, and indeed the geodesic is a unit circle around the origin, i.e., a great circle on the sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top