Solving Argand Diagram: Finding z + w = -4+3i

  • Thread starter Thread starter thereddevils
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Argand Diagram
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the argument of a complex number z given that arg(z/(1-i))=pi/2, and sketching the Argand diagram for z and the complex number w=-4+3i. The task also includes deducing the least value of |z+4-3i|.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the argument being pi/2 or -pi/2 and explore the properties of arguments in complex numbers. There are attempts to relate the problem to Cartesian coordinates and the shortest distance between points and lines.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the properties of complex numbers and suggesting various approaches to finding the least value of |z+4-3i|. Some participants have offered guidance on using distance formulas and properties of logarithms, while others are exploring different methods to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the argument's sign and the setup of the distance formula. Participants are also considering the implications of the problem's geometric interpretation.

thereddevils
Messages
436
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that arg(z/(1-i))=pi/2, find the argument of z.

Sketch , in the Argand diagram , the set of points representing z and the point representing the complex number w=-4+3i. Hence deduce the least value of |z+4-3i|

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let z=a+bi

Rationalising z/(1-i)=(a-b)/2+(a+b)/2 i

negative pi/2 suggest that the point is on the negative y-axis.

tan pi/2 = [(a-b)/2]/[(a+b)/2]

hence a=b

And since (a+b)/2 is negative, a<0 , b<0

so z=a+ai or b+bi

(a,a) is in the third quadrant, and the argument of z is -3pi/4

I have no problem in sketching. The problem i have is with the last part.

Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given that arg(z/(1-i))=pi/2...
...negative pi/2 suggest that the point is on the negative y-axis.

So which is it, \pi/2 or -\pi/2?

You can solve the first faster and easier by using arg\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)=arg(a)-arg(b)

The least value of |z+4-3i| is saying what point z where arg(z)=\frac{-3\pi}{4} thus z=a(1+i), a<0 is closest to the point (-4+3i)? If you think about this in cartesian coordinates, z lies on the line y=x where x<0. Now all you have to do is find out the closest distance between the point (-4,3) and the line y=x.
The problem could even be simplified using logic since we know the line connecting the shortest distance between z and the point is at right angles so the gradient of the line is -1.
 
Mentallic said:
So which is it, \pi/2 or -\pi/2?

You can solve the first faster and easier by using arg\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)=arg(a)-arg(b)

Is this the property of arguments? Looks to be similar to the property of logs.

The least value of |z+4-3i| is saying what point z where arg(z)=\frac{-3\pi}{4} thus z=a(1+i), a<0 is closest to the point (-4+3i)? If you think about this in cartesian coordinates, z lies on the line y=x where x<0. Now all you have to do is find out the closest distance between the point (-4,3) and the line y=x.
The problem could even be simplified using logic since we know the line connecting the shortest distance between z and the point is at right angles so the gradient of the line is -1.

thanks Mentallic.
 
thereddevils said:
Is this the property of arguments? Looks to be similar to the property of logs.

It sure does :smile:

If you want to prove it, let x=r cis\theta and y=Rcis\phi and then rationalize x/y and use some properties of trigonometry to simplify it down.
 
It is precisely a "property of logarithms" because the argument of a complex number is a property of exponentials.

Write complex number a, with magnitude r_1 and argument \theta_1, in the form r_1e^{i\theta_1} and the complex number b, with magnitude r_2 and argument \theta_2, in the form r_2e^{i\theta_2}.

Then
\frac{a}{b}= \frac{r_1e^{i\theta_1}}{r_2e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}\frac{e^{i\theta_1}}{e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}e^{i(\theta_1- \theta_2)}}

That is, the magnitude of a/b is r_1/r_2 and its argument is \theta_1- \theta_2.
 
And another student discovers the miracles of Euler's formula.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It is precisely a "property of logarithms" because the argument of a complex number is a property of exponentials.

Write complex number a, with magnitude r_1 and argument \theta_1, in the form r_1e^{i\theta_1} and the complex number b, with magnitude r_2 and argument \theta_2, in the form r_2e^{i\theta_2}.

Then
\frac{a}{b}= \frac{r_1e^{i\theta_1}}{r_2e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}\frac{e^{i\theta_1}}{e^{i\theta_2}}= \frac{r_1}{r_2}e^{i(\theta_1- \theta_2)}}

That is, the magnitude of a/b is r_1/r_2 and its argument is \theta_1- \theta_2.

Thanks Hallsofivy, and wow how long have you been on this forum?You have made 27000 posts!
 
Is the answer for the least value sqrt(53/2) ?
 
No not quite. Show us what you did.
 
  • #10
Mentallic said:
No not quite. Show us what you did.

I drew a diagram, with right angled triangle WOZ. Using the perpendicular gradients,

(a/a)((3-a)/(-4-a))=-1

a=-1/2

Then i proceed to find the distance between (-4,3) and (-1/2,-1/2) which gives that answer.
 
  • #11
Ok so you set up your question properly, you just used the distance formula incorrectly.

d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}

Where (x_1,y_1)=(-1/2,-1/2) and (x_2,y_2)=(-4,3)

I can think of some other ways to solve this problem which might be of interest to you.

So we have d=\sqrt{(x-4)^2+(y+3)^2} to denote the distance from the point(4,-3) to a circle's circumference with that centre and radius d. We also have the equation y=x so if we plug y into the distance equation and simplify we get d=\sqrt{2x^2-2x+25} but we want to find the minimum distance so we want the minimum value of the quadratic under the sq.root. Just use some calculus and you'll find x=1/2, which can be substituted back into the distance equation to give you the answer.
 
  • #12
Mentallic said:
Ok so you set up your question properly, you just used the distance formula incorrectly.

d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}

Where (x_1,y_1)=(-1/2,-1/2) and (x_2,y_2)=(-4,3)

I can think of some other ways to solve this problem which might be of interest to you.

So we have d=\sqrt{(x-4)^2+(y+3)^2} to denote the distance from the point(4,-3) to a circle's circumference with that centre and radius d. We also have the equation y=x so if we plug y into the distance equation and simplify we get d=\sqrt{2x^2-2x+25} but we want to find the minimum distance so we want the minimum value of the quadratic under the sq.root. Just use some calculus and you'll find x=1/2, which can be substituted back into the distance equation to give you the answer.

thanks Mentallic, it can also be solved using trigonometry and vectors.
 
  • #13
Yep, and if you go back to precalculus class they would be using a specific distance formula for the distance between a point and a line :wink:

By the way, I have no idea why this was moved to the precalc forum.
 
  • #14
thereddevils said:
Thanks Hallsofivy, and wow how long have you been on this forum?You have made 27000 posts!

I started last night and, boy, are my fingers tired!:smile:
 
  • #15
Halls, an average of 10 posts per day for the passed 7 years... umm... just one question. Assuming you have to take a break once a year or so, for christmas maybe :wink: how many posts have you made on your big days? I'm suspecting you spammed the general forum like hell :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K