Solving Ball Throw Problem: Velocity & Distance for Boy & Dog

  • Thread starter Thread starter k2var2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a boy throwing a ball from a height of 11.0 meters at an angle of 40.0° with an initial velocity of 7.50 m/s. The key equations for calculating the time of flight and distance traveled are provided, with an emphasis on the correct application of kinematic equations. The user, Kyle, initially calculated the time as 1.5 seconds and the distance as 4.82 meters but expressed confusion about the results. Other participants suggest revisiting the fundamental equations and avoiding shortcuts that may lead to incorrect conclusions. Clarification on the derivation of time in two-dimensional motion is also discussed.
k2var2002
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1. A boy 11.0m above the ground in a tree throws a ball for his dog, who is standing
right below the tree and starts running the instant the ball is thrown.
If the boy throws the ball upward at 40.0° above the horizontal, at 7.50m/s .
What is velocity (m/s)? and distance (m)?


2. y=yo+voy*t-1/2gt^2

y= yo+sin\theta*t-1/2gt^2

1/2gt/yo= voy

R= Voy*t=Vosin\theta*t

t= \sqrt{}(2y/g)^2

3. I plugged the known variables into the equations i listed above. First for time, I got t=1.5s. Then I used the angle and time found to find distance, R=(7.5)(sin40)=4.82 m. Which doesn't make sense to me. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

-Kyle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Kyle! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
k2var2002 said:
2. y=yo+voy*t-1/2gt^2

How did you get t= √(2y/g)^2 from that? :confused:
 
t= √(2y/g)^2 is just a derivation of some sort that my professor had given us to figure time in 2d motion.
 
Would t=Vo/-a work from the base equation Vy=Vo+at?
 
k2var2002 said:
t= √(2y/g)^2 is just a derivation of some sort that my professor had given us to figure time in 2d motion.

That only works if v0 = 0 … just look at the original equation.

Stop looking for shortcuts!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top