Solving Bernoulli's ODE with y' + p(x)y=q(x)y^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechdude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bernoulli's
Mechdude
Messages
108
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


\frac{dy}{dx}= - \frac{c}{n} y^{n}


Homework Equations




y' + p(x)y=q(x) y^n

The Attempt at a Solution


im strictly speaking able to do it , i just wanted to kno whether I am on the right track using bernoulli's equation, not that i can see any other methods!
;-)
cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If c and n are constants then you can just divide by yn and you'd have a separable ODE
 
thanks , i try that ( c and n are constants). seems less involving if not actually suggesting i was on the wrong track
 
rock.freak667 said:
If c and n are constants then you can just divide by yn and you'd have a separable ODE

Mechdude said:
thanks , i try that ( c and n are constants). seems less involving if not actually suggesting i was on the wrong track

I don't think you will find it to be separable. Bernoulli's method is the way to go. Dividing by yn puts it in the form

y(-n)y' +p(x)y(1-n)= q(x)

and the change variable v = y(1-n) transforms it into a linear first order equation which can be done with an integrating factor.

[edit] Correction -- your specific equation is indeed separable, it is the general Bernoulli equation that isn't.
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
I don't think you will find it to be separable. Bernoulli's method is the way to go. Dividing by yn puts it in the form

y(-n)y' +p(x)y(1-n)= q(x)

and the change variable v = y(1-n) transforms it into a linear first order equation which can be done with an integrating factor.

[edit] Correction -- your specific equation is indeed separable, it is the general Bernoulli equation that isn't.

i did find it to be separable and got an expression for a problem I am working on that agrees with the solution provided, so I am confident about that . thanks though.

here's the source of the d.e. for the curious :
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2587065#post2587065
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top