Solving Circular Motion: Train Slows from 90 to 50 km/h

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a train as it slows from 90 km/h to 50 km/h while rounding a curve with a radius of 150 meters over 15 seconds. Participants confirm that both tangential and centripetal accelerations must be considered, with the tangential acceleration calculated as -2.67 m/s². The total acceleration is determined to be 2.96 m/s² at an angle of 64.28 degrees relative to the radius. There is agreement that treating the motion as one-dimensional for calculating tangential acceleration is acceptable. The calculations and methods discussed are validated by participants, confirming the approach is correct.
blackboy
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Homework Statement
A train slows down as it rounds a sharp horizontal turn, slowing from
90.0 km/h to 50.0km/h in that 15.0s that it takes to round the bend. The
radius of the curve is 150m. Compute the acceleration at the moment the train
speed reaches 50.0 km/h. Assume that it continues to slow down at this time at
the same rate.


Homework Equations


Kinematics
Circular Motion


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand we have to add the tangential acceleration to the centripetal acceleration. Can I just treat this motion as a straight line to compute the tangential acceleration? Can we do this for most problems like this? If so, then the tangential acceleration is -2.67 m/s^2. Then the total acceleration is 2.96 m/s^2 64.28 degrees of the radius.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assumed you used "90.0 km/h to 50.0km/h in that 15.0s" to get the tangential acceleration of -2.67m/s2?

and then used 50km/h in 150m radius for the normal acceleration right?

then added them up using a vector method?

If so then it should be correct.
 
Yes, but can we pretend it was 1-d kinematics to find the tangential acceleration?
 
blackboy said:
Yes, but can we pretend it was 1-d kinematics to find the tangential acceleration?

that is how you found the tangential acceleration, so yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top