Solving Complex Differential Equations: What Are the Steps?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cos
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving complex differential equations, specifically the equations x^2y' - cos(2y) = 1 and x^2y' + cos(2y) = 1. Participants confirm that the equations are separable and suggest using trigonometric identities to simplify the process. One user successfully solves for y using arctan and shares their progress on additional equations, including y' = (4x + 2y - 1)^(1/2) and (1-xy)y' + y^2 + 3xy^3 = 0. For the last equation, advice is given to square the equation and differentiate to form a new ordinary differential equation (ODE) for further analysis. The conversation highlights collaborative problem-solving in tackling complex ODEs.
Icebreaker
How do I go about solving

x^2y' - cos (2y) = 1

This is unlike anything I've seen so far. Or so I think.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Icebreaker said:
How do I go about solving

x^2y' + cos (2y) = 1

This is unlike anything I've seen so far. Or so I think.

It's separable right?
 
saltydog said:
It's separable right?
Yes
Trig is your friend.
as a matter of personal taste I enjoy the use of the identity
1-cos(2y)=2(sin(y/2))^2
 
Ok, I got it, thanks for the help.

I got y = arctan ( c = 2/x)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
18 down, 2 more to go:

y' = (4x + 2y - 1)^(1/2)

and

(1-xy)y' + y ^2 + 3xy^3 = 0

The last one kinda looks like Riccati, but I can't get it to work.

edit: I got the second one. One more ODE remains... I don't know how to approach that one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Icebreaker said:
18 down, 2 more to go:

y' = (4x + 2y - 1)^(1/2)

and

(1-xy)y' + y ^2 + 3xy^3 = 0

The last one kinda looks like Riccati, but I can't get it to work.

edit: I got the second one. One more ODE remains... I don't know how to approach that one.

Regarding:

\frac{dy}{dx}=\sqrt{4x+2y-1}

How about squaring it for starters. Then let:

p=\frac{dy}{dx}

Differentiate it to get an ODE in p. Then separate variables.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top