Solving Conductor Questions: Surface Charge, Electron Count, Electric Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter lha08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving problems related to a metal sphere's surface charge density, electron count, and electric field strength. The surface charge density was calculated using the formula Q = 4πR²σ, resulting in a value of 8.84 x 10^-6 C/m², which was confirmed as correct. The total charge was then converted to the number of electrons by dividing by the charge of a single electron, which was also validated as an appropriate method. For the electric field strength, the formula E = kQ/r² was applied correctly, using the radius of 0.01 m. Overall, the calculations and methods used in the solutions were affirmed as accurate.
lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The potential of a metal sphere of diameter 2 cm is 10^4 V relative to the ground.
a) What is the surface charge density?
b) How many electrons were removed from the sphere?
c) What is the electric field strength at the surface?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) so first I converted the diameter into the radius (0.01 m). Then I considered the formula
Q (total charge)= 4 X pi X R^2 X sigma. The sigma is the surface charge density. So then since i have the electric potential and the radius, I replaced Q in the first equation with the electric potential. In this case, VR/k =Q where k=9.0X10^9...and when I solved it, I got 8.84X10^-6 C/m^2...but does this seem right because I have a gut feeling that it isn't...

b) for the next question, i solved for Q (the total charge) and then converted the Joules into electrons by dividing the total charge by 1.602X10^-19 C...again I'm not sure if my method makes sense...

c) for the last one, I used E= kq/r^2..and I basically plugged in the numbers but I'm not sure if placing 0.01 m for the radius is the right move...

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lha08 said:
a) so first I converted the diameter into the radius (0.01 m). Then I considered the formula
Q (total charge)= 4 X pi X R^2 X sigma. The sigma is the surface charge density. So then since i have the electric potential and the radius, I replaced Q in the first equation with the electric potential. In this case, VR/k =Q where k=9.0X10^9...and when I solved it, I got 8.84X10^-6 C/m^2...but does this seem right because I have a gut feeling that it isn't...

It's right. The static charge that builds up on everyday objects is extremely small, on the order of millionths or billionths of a coloumb. Even a cloud-to-ground lightning strike delivers only 300 coloumbs.

b) for the next question, i solved for Q (the total charge) and then converted the Joules into electrons by dividing the total charge by 1.602X10^-19 C...again I'm not sure if my method makes sense...

Well, you didn't convert the joules to electrons; you converted the coloumbs to electrons. Your method is right.

c) for the last one, I used E= kq/r^2..and I basically plugged in the numbers but I'm not sure if placing 0.01 m for the radius is the right move...

Yup, that's how you do it.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top