Solving Cosmology Problem on Page 12 of Damtp.cam.ac.uk

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
I'm looking through the solution to a problem and am stuck with some of the maths.
The solution can be found here:
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/r.ribeiro/supervisions_files/Cosmo1sol_M2010.pdf

The pages are numbered in the bottom right corner. I am on p12.

We have an expression 1+z \simeq \frac{1}{\dots} half way down the page. I can get to here fine.

Then she solves for z. How has she done this? Is it binomial? If so how has that worked? We have two terms here not just the usual (1+x)^n

And there is a new term that appears when we solve for z: H_0^2(t-t_0)^2. Where's that from?

Then under that we "invert" to find t-t_0 Iliterally have no idea what has happened here!

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first part is just a Taylor expansion in powers of t-t_0. You can use the binomial expansion to do this, but if that's giving you problems just compute the necessary derivatives.

The "inversion" is just solving a quadratic equation. Did you even try working this part out for yourself before posting?
 
fzero said:
The first part is just a Taylor expansion in powers of t-t_0. You can use the binomial expansion to do this, but if that's giving you problems just compute the necessary derivatives.

The "inversion" is just solving a quadratic equation. Did you even try working this part out for yourself before posting?

Hmm. well say you have (1+x)^{-1}=1-x where for us x=H_0(t-t_0) - \frac{1}{2} q_0 H_0^2(t-t_0)^2

then (1+x)^{-1}= 1-H_0(t-t_0) - \frac{1}{2} q_0 H_0^2(t-t_0)^2 but I'm missing a term?And then for the next bit i think i was confused by the word "inverting". Nonetheless, it's a quadratic so we should be able to use x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}

In the form (1+\frac{1}{2}q_0 ) H_0^2 x^2 - H_0 x - z = 0 with x=t-t_0

we get x = \frac{H_0 \pm \sqrt{H_0^2 + 4z(1+\frac{1}{2}q_0)}}{(2+q_0)H_0^2}
which doesn't look very promising
 
latentcorpse said:
Hmm. well say you have (1+x)^{-1}=1-x where for us x=H_0(t-t_0) - \frac{1}{2} q_0 H_0^2(t-t_0)^2

then (1+x)^{-1}= 1-H_0(t-t_0) - \frac{1}{2} q_0 H_0^2(t-t_0)^2 but I'm missing a term?

You have to include terms of order x^2 to obtain all of the terms of order (t-t_0)^2.

And then for the next bit i think i was confused by the word "inverting". Nonetheless, it's a quadratic so we should be able to use x=\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}

In the form (1+\frac{1}{2}q_0 ) H_0^2 x^2 - H_0 x - z = 0 with x=t-t_0

we get x = \frac{H_0 \pm \sqrt{H_0^2 + 4z(1+\frac{1}{2}q_0)}}{(2+q_0)H_0^2}
which doesn't look very promising

They've expanded the square root in powers of z.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top