nickthequick
- 39
- 0
Hi,
I am trying to simplify the following equations to get a relationship involving just \eta:
1) \nabla^2 \phi(x,z,t) = 0
for x\in [-\infty,\infty] and z\in [-\infty,0], t \in [0,\infty]
subject to the boundary conditions
2) \phi_t+g \eta(x,t) = f(x,z,t) at z=0
3) \eta_t = \phi_z at z=0
and
4) \phi \to 0 \ as \ z \to -\infty
Here, g is a constant, \eta, \phi are the dependent variables of the system and f represents a forcing function. Another important constraint is that for systems I'm interested in, f is non zero only for a small time interval.
For the case where f=0, one can find that
\eta_{tt}-\frac{g}{k} \eta_{xx} =0
where k is the wavenumber of the system.
I want to find an analogous relation when forcing is present.
Any help is appreciated,
Nick
I am trying to simplify the following equations to get a relationship involving just \eta:
1) \nabla^2 \phi(x,z,t) = 0
for x\in [-\infty,\infty] and z\in [-\infty,0], t \in [0,\infty]
subject to the boundary conditions
2) \phi_t+g \eta(x,t) = f(x,z,t) at z=0
3) \eta_t = \phi_z at z=0
and
4) \phi \to 0 \ as \ z \to -\infty
Here, g is a constant, \eta, \phi are the dependent variables of the system and f represents a forcing function. Another important constraint is that for systems I'm interested in, f is non zero only for a small time interval.
For the case where f=0, one can find that
\eta_{tt}-\frac{g}{k} \eta_{xx} =0
where k is the wavenumber of the system.
I want to find an analogous relation when forcing is present.
Any help is appreciated,
Nick