Solving Decoupled System of ODEs with Matrix b

jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Given the matrix b=\begin{pmatrix}-1&0&-1\\-4&3&-1\\0&0&-2\end{pmatrix} decide if the system of ODEs, \frac{dx}{dt}=Bx is decoupled. If yes find the general solution x=xh(t)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I would say the matrix is decoupled since the second equation involving 2x2(t) can be solved without the other two equations. Then the third equation can be solved without knowing x1(t). We have:

x1(t)-x2(t)-3x3(t)=x'1
2x2(t)=x'2
x2(t)+4x3(t)=x'3

Im not sure where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimmycricket said:

Homework Statement



Given the matrix b=\begin{pmatrix}-1&0&-1\\-4&3&-1\\0&0&-2\end{pmatrix} decide if the system of ODEs, \frac{dx}{dt}=Bx is decoupled. If yes find the general solution x=xh(t)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I would say the matrix is decoupled since the second equation involving 2x2(t) can be solved without the other two equations. Then the third equation can be solved without knowing x1(t). We have:

x1(t)-x2(t)-3x3(t)=x'1
2x2(t)=x'2
x2(t)+4x3(t)=x'3

Im not sure where to go from here.

How did you get that? You have
<br /> \begin{pmatrix} \dot x_1 \\ \dot x_2 \\ \dot x_3 \end{pmatrix}<br /> = \begin{pmatrix}-1&amp;0&amp;-1\\-4&amp;3&amp;-1\\0&amp;0&amp;-2\end{pmatrix}<br /> \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{pmatrix}<br />
Hence
<br /> \dot x_1 = -x_1 - x_3 \\<br /> \dot x_2 = -4x_1 + 3x_2 - x_3 \\<br /> \dot x_3 = -2x_3<br />
 
yes that's what I wrote down on paper. There was a bit of a mistranslation when trying to write it in latex.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top