Solving Diff Eqns: Renaming Constants & Reversing Signs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joseph1739
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants
Joseph1739
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Suppose I'm at this point in solving a differential equation and the initial condition is Q(0) = Q0
-ln|25-Q| + c1 = rt/100 + c2
Then if I combine c2-c1, I can rename it to c, we have:
-ln|25-Q| = rt/100 + c
Now if I multiply the equation by (-1), I get:
ln|25-Q| = -rt/100 - c
If I let -c = C:
ln|25-Q| -rt/100 +C

But if I rewrite -c = C, all the signs are reversed when I solve for Q. Also solving for the constant, my book kept the -c, and got c = Q0-25, but when I rewrite -c to C, I get C = 25-Q0.

So my question is, when can I rename constants? When I combined two constants it is okay to to rename the constant, but why is it incorrect when I negate a constant and rename it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Joseph1739 said:
Suppose I'm at this point in solving a differential equation and the initial condition is Q(0) = Q0
-ln|25-Q| + c1 = rt/100 + c2
You can simplify things a bit by including the constant only on one side (the right side).

Joseph1739 said:
Then if I combine c2-c1, I can rename it to c, we have:
-ln|25-Q| = rt/100 + c
Now if I multiply the equation by (-1), I get:
ln|25-Q| = -rt/100 - c
If I let -c = C:
ln|25-Q| -rt/100 +C
You lost an = in the line above.
Joseph1739 said:
But if I rewrite -c = C, all the signs are reversed when I solve for Q. Also solving for the constant, my book kept the -c, and got c = Q0-25, but when I rewrite -c to C, I get C = 25-Q0.

So my question is, when can I rename constants?
Whenever you want to.
Joseph1739 said:
When I combined two constants it is okay to to rename the constant, but why is it incorrect when I negate a constant and rename it?
If -c = C, and the book shows c = ##Q_0 - 25##, then C = ##-(Q_0 - 25) = 25 - Q_0##.
 
Joseph1739 said:
Suppose I'm at this point in solving a differential equation and the initial condition is Q(0) = Q0
-ln|25-Q| + c1 = rt/100 + c2
Then if I combine c2-c1, I can rename it to c, we have:
-ln|25-Q| = rt/100 + c
Now if I multiply the equation by (-1), I get:
ln|25-Q| = -rt/100 - c
If I let -c = C:
ln|25-Q| -rt/100 +C

But if I rewrite -c = C, all the signs are reversed when I solve for Q. Also solving for the constant, my book kept the -c, and got c = Q0-25, but when I rewrite -c to C, I get C = 25-Q0.

So my question is, when can I rename constants? When I combined two constants it is okay to to rename the constant, but why is it incorrect when I negate a constant and rename it?

Check your math. Your calculation of c and -C are wrong.

Looking at your last 2 equations, at t=0 you either get ln\left|25-Q_0 \right| = -c or ln\left|25-Q_0 \right| = C. These two results agree with your definition c=-C.

You can always define a new constant as a combination of multiple constants.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top