Solving Diophantine equation stuck, what do I do next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdnhldn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
jdnhldn
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to determine if an diophantine equation is solveable or not. And got stuck at one point.

Homework Equations


61x+37y=2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the gcd(61,37)=1 by:

61/37=1 %24
37/24=1 %13
24/13=1 %11
13/11=1 %2
11/2=5 %1
2/1=2 %0

So gcd(61,37)=1

I know that I now should go backwards and express gcd(61,37) as a linear combination of61 and 37. But I don't understand it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdnhldn said:

Homework Statement


I am trying to determine if an diophantine equation is solveable or not. And got stuck at one point.

Homework Equations


61x+37y=2

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the gcd(61,37)=1 by:

61/37=1 %24
37/24=1 %13
24/13=1 %11
13/11=1 %2
11/2=5 %1
2/1=2 %0

So gcd(61,37)=1

I know that I now should go backwards and express gcd(61,37) as a linear combination of61 and 37. But I don't understand it?

you should do like this, it maybe help to see

61 = (1)37 + 24
37 = (1)24 + 13
24 = (1)13 + 11
13 = (1)11 + 2
11 =(5)2 +1

so 1 = 11 - (5)2

you know 2 = 13 - (1)11 and 11 = 24 - (1)13 and similar to 13 and 24

just play with the numbers until you get the form 1 = (...)61 + (...)37
 
annoymage said:
you should do like this, it maybe help to see

61 = (1)37 + 24
37 = (1)24 + 13
24 = (1)13 + 11
13 = (1)11 + 2
11 =(5)2 +1

so 1 = 11 - (5)2

you know 2 = 13 - (1)11 and 11 = 24 - (1)13 and similar to 13 and 24

just play with the numbers until you get the form 1 = (...)61 + (...)37

Thank you, but is there a quick way to see if the equation is solvable or not? Or do I need to go all the way to find out?
 
jdnhldn said:
Thank you, but is there a quick way to see if the equation is solvable or not? Or do I need to go all the way to find out?

You can always solve ax + by = k \text{gcd}(a,b) (This is Bezout's identity and it is solved using the Euclidean algorithm).

Clearly if x',y' solves ax' + by' = \text{gcd}(a,b) then x = kx', y = ky' solves ax + by = k \text{gcd}(a,b), Thus you only have to work on ax' + by' = \text{gcd}(a,b), you can use the hint annoymage gives to prove this once and for all (as well as calculate x' and y' in specific cases where the numbers are given).
 
Thank you, I've got it. Now I saw the lights.
 
The "(n)" made me see it clearly. Thank you so much.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top