Solving Elastic Collision - Get Help Now!

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision problem involving two carts, the first cart with a mass of 340 g moves at an initial speed of 1.2 m/s and continues at 0.66 m/s after colliding with a stationary second cart of unknown mass. The discussion revolves around using the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations to find the mass and speed of the second cart post-collision. A participant struggles with the algebraic manipulation of these equations, particularly in substituting variables correctly. Clarification is provided that the correct approach involves expressing the final speed of the second cart in terms of the other variables and simplifying the equations to eliminate quadratics. Ultimately, the participant resolves their confusion and successfully applies the method.
johnhuntsman
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
A cart with a mass of 340 g moving on a frictionless linear air
track at an initial speed of 1.2 m/s undergoes an elastic collision with an
initially stationary cart of unknown mass. After the collision, the rst cart
continues in the same direction at 0.66 m/s. (a) What is the mass of the
second cart? (b) What is its speed after the collision?

I have two equations: Conservation of Momentum and Conservation of KE (since this is elastic).

m1vi = m1v1 + m2v2

.5m1vi2 = .5m1v12 + .5m2v22

I've solved for v2 using the equation for Conservation of Momentum, and plugged that into the equation for Conservation of KE and my answer is wrong (used up about a page of algebra, please don't expect me to type it out all on here). The correct answer can be found using the method in the PDF below.

http://www.physics.ucc.ie/py1052_ps6.pdf (problem 8)

My issue is that they solve for v1f (or as I called it in the equations above, v1) and yet v2f (or v2) is nowhere to be found on the side opposite of their v1f. I don't see how their algebra makes any sense. All I want is someone to explain this to me as this is supposed to be a straightforward question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
johnhuntsman said:
.5m1vi2 = .5m1v12 + m2v22
You missed a 0.5 there. Is it as simple as that?
My issue is that they solve for v1f (or as I called it in the equations above, v1) and yet v2f (or v2) is nowhere to be found on the side opposite of their v1f.
They used the momentum equation to get v2f in terms of the other variables, then substituted that in the KE equation.
 
haruspex said:
They used the momentum equation to get v2f in terms of the other variables, then substituted that in the KE equation.

v2f = [m1vi - m1vf] / m2

Substitute that into cons. of KE:

.5m1vi2 = .5m1v12 + .5m2[(m1vi - m1v1) / m2]2

Which still doesn't look like what they have. This is what I solved and I ended up getting .127 kg. What mistake have I made at this point that I'm not seeing?

P.S. Eqn. for conservation of KE is fixed.
 
johnhuntsman said:
.5m1vi2 = .5m1v12 + .5m2[(m1vi - m1v1) / m2]2

Which still doesn't look like what they have.
Work with that some. You should find vi - v1 cancels, getting rid of the quadratic.
 
use this after you get the numbers from momentum equation of:

ƩPi=ƩPf

(you have the break down of the above correct?)Now plug into this

0=ΔKE+ΔPEg+ΔPEspring
=1/2mv2f-1/2mv2f+mghf-mghi+1/2kx2f-1/2kx2f

Now just place you values in the equation and remove things that you don't use for example the spring.
 
haruspex said:
Work with that some. You should find vi - v1 cancels, getting rid of the quadratic.

Alrighty, thanks. That did it. I appreciate it : D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top