Solving Energy Work Problems: Examples #1 & #2

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the concept of work in physics is clarified through two examples. In Example #1, it is established that Brenda does zero work while carrying a suitcase at constant velocity because the force she exerts is vertical while the displacement is horizontal, resulting in no work done. Example #2 demonstrates that a 55N force at an angle does perform work on a crate, calculated using the formula W = F * d * cos(θ), where θ is the angle of the force. The conversation emphasizes that work is determined by the direction of the force relative to the displacement, not just the presence of acceleration. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving energy work problems effectively.
JudyyNunez
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering if anyone could please help me understand when is there no work in Joules being produced when your object is moving at a constant velocity.

Example #1: Brenda carries a 5.0 kg suitcase as she walks m along a horizontal walkway to her room at a constant speed of 6.5 m/s. How much work does Brenda do in carrying her case?

Example #2: A force of magnitude 55N directed at an angle of 37 degrees above the horizontal moves a 30kg crate along a horizontal surface at constant velocity. How much work is done by this force in moving the crate a distance of 15m?

W=F*d F=ma

For example #1 Brenda should be doing zero work due to the fact that there is no acceleration involved. Therefore, the force would be zero since acceleration is needed to create force (F=ma).

Example #2, would the work produced equal 55cos 37 degrees times 15 meters? or would it be zero work since no acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
#1: the Force Brenda applies is upward, but the motion (displacement) is sideways. The Force is neither along the displacement, nor opposite the displacement, so it does neither positive nor negative Work.

Forces CAUSE acceleration , not the other way around!

#2: the 55N Force is partly along the displacement ... 4/5 of the Force is along the motion.
So THAT portion of the Force does positive Work ... to have no change in the crate's KE, there must be some other Force doing the same amount of NEGATIVE Work to the crate - I wonder what that Force would be ...
 
Hello JudyyNunez,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

JudyyNunez said:
Hi, I was wondering if anyone could please help me understand when is there no work in Joules being produced when your object is moving at a constant velocity.

Example #1: Brenda carries a 5.0 kg suitcase as she walks m along a horizontal walkway to her room at a constant speed of 6.5 m/s. How much work does Brenda do in carrying her case?

Example #2: A force of magnitude 55N directed at an angle of 37 degrees above the horizontal moves a 30kg crate along a horizontal surface at constant velocity. How much work is done by this force in moving the crate a distance of 15m?

W=F*d F=ma

For example #1 Brenda should be doing zero work due to the fact that there is no acceleration involved. Therefore, the force would be zero since acceleration is needed to create force (F=ma).
It's true that the net force is zero. Brenda's vertical force on the suitcase is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force of gravity, so the net force is zero. But that's not why the work done is zero.

The reason that the work done is zero in this case has to do with the direction of the force relative to the direction of the displacement. In what direction is the force Brenda applies on the suitcase? Which direction does the suitcase travel?

What is the dot product between perpendicular vectors?

By the way, when dealing with the concept of work it is often okay and even necessary to consider each force individually. It's okay to distinguish the work done by Brenda, or the work done by gravity, or the work done by friction. You don't need to always jump to the net force. That doesn't matter so much for this example, but it will for other examples.

Example #2, would the work produced equal 55cos 37 degrees times 15 meters?
Yes, that is correct. But make sure you understand why. :wink:

or would it be zero work since no acceleration?

No, it's not zero. It's okay here to consider the individual forces involved. The question asks for the work done by the 55N force. You can ignore, for this example, the work done by the other forces, and you can also ignore the net force (for this example).
 
I understand now, thank you to both of you for replying!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top