Solving Enthaply by other ways?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fubear
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the adiabatic expansion of 2 moles of an ideal gas, questioning the calculations of work (w), change in internal energy (dE), change in enthalpy (dH), and temperature change (dT). Initial calculations show w and dE as -997.78J, while dH is derived using different methods, yielding inconsistent results, leading to confusion about the correct approach. There is a debate on whether dH can be calculated using the formula dH = dE + d(PV) and the implications of constant pressure on dH and heat transfer (q). Participants clarify that while the external pressure remains constant, the process is adiabatic, affecting temperature and internal energy. The conversation highlights the complexities of thermodynamic calculations and the importance of understanding process definitions.
fubear
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
2 moles of an ideal gas at 300K and 5 bar is expanded adiabatically at a constant pressure of 1 bar till the volume doubles. Cv = 3R/2. Calculate w, q, dE, dH and change in T.

I found that w = dE = -997.78J

In class we solved dH by:

dH = CpdT = -1.66kJ

(we found Cp by Cp=Cv+nR ; we found dT by Cv=dE/dT)


I was wondering if we could solve dH another way:
dH = dE + d(PV)

However, I get a different answer..
dH = dE + Pext dV (because pressure is constant)
dH = -997.78J +-997.78J (because Pext dV is work)
dH = -2.00 kJ

I also tried another way:
dH = dE + d(nRT)
dH = -977J + (2mol)(8.3145J/K)(-80K)
dH = -1.08kJ

I am not getting the same value for each of the different ways I am using... Am I doing something wrong or am I not allowed to solve dH using the other methods?

Also, at constant pressure, isn't dH = qrev.. and q=0, so shouldn't dH = 0?


Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fubear said:
2 moles of an ideal gas at 300K and 5 bar is expanded adiabatically at a constant pressure
It is adiabatic or at constant pressure? How can be both?
 
The external pressure is constant, but the system undergoes an adiabatic process
 
I'm with nasu here. If the gas expands adiabatically pushing out a piston, then it will do work pushing out the piston, and its internal energy will fall. So, therefore, will its temperature, and its pressure (since P = nRT/V and T goes down and V goes up).
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top