Solving Equations in Spherical Coordinates with Elliptic Integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter boarie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
boarie
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Dear gurus

Can anyone kindly enlighten me how to go abt solving the attached equation expressed in spherical coordinates? basically, it describes the magnetic field in the radial direction with r,theta and phi denoting the radius, polar and azimuthal angles.

My problem is that I do not know how to relate this equation to elliptic integral as it is to the power of 3/2. :confused: Any help is deeply appreciated. o:)

Thx in advance!
 

Attachments

  • elliptic.jpg
    elliptic.jpg
    11.1 KB · Views: 496
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here's the trick. U need to use some notations

R^{2}+r^{2} =p^{2}

2rR\sin\vartheta =u

One has that p^2 >0 \ ,\ u>0.

Then the integral becomes

B_{r}(r,\vartheta) =C \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{\left(p^{2}-u \sin\phi\right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} = C

times the result below. The notation for the complete elliptic integrals is the one Mathematica uses. U can check it out on the Wolfram site and compare it to the standard one (for example the one in Gradshteyn & Rytzik).

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top