Solving Fifth Roots of z = 1 + √2

  • Thread starter Thread starter dogma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
dogma
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Here's a silly roots question that has my congested mind temporarily stumped:

Let z = 1 + \sqrt{2}. Find the five distinct fifth roots of z.

Thanks in advance for helping me relieve the pressure.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Some of the roots are going to be complex, so the way I would tackle the problem is to rewrite your number in the form:

z=(1+\sqrt{2}){\rm e}^{2\pi ni},

where n=0,1,2,... Then taking the fifth root gives:

z^{1/5}=(1+\sqrt{2})^{1/5} {\rm e}^{2\pi ni/5},

which you can write in the form:

z^{1/5}=(1+\sqrt{2})^{1/5} \left \{ \cos \left ( \frac{2\pi n}{5} \right) +i \sin \left( \frac{2\pi n}{5} \right) \right \}.

Evaluating this for different n, should give 5 distinct roots.
 
thank you very much for the insight...I now proceed to kick myself for not seeing it on my own {sound of kicking}

Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top