Solving for a and t Given s, vi, and vf

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for acceleration (a) and time (t) given specific values for displacement (s), initial velocity (vi), and final velocity (vf). The user correctly derived equations leading to t = 11.1 seconds and a = 2.43 m/s², but faced confusion over the validity of using derivatives in their calculations. Participants confirmed that the approach is valid, as the equations represent different aspects of the same physical scenario. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic and clarifies that integrating the differential equation can yield the correct results. Overall, the method of using derivatives to solve for variables in kinematic equations is affirmed as acceptable.
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
Here is the info.

s = 150m
a = ?
t = ?
vi = 0
vf = 27

Here is what I did:

27 = at
27/t = a

Put a into another unsolved equation.

150 = 1/2(27/t)t^2
11.1 = t

Put the known variable into the first equation.

27 = a(11.1)
2.43 = a

All I did was take variables, and insert it into it's derivative, or antiderivative. I'm getting different answers using other methods. Can someone explain if this is incorrect?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your algebra seems correct, how ever your arithemtic is suspect.

I get t=11.1s
 
Yeah, you're right.

Human error. :biggrin:

So, even though you are matching up numbers of different graphs, it still is valid?
 
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is yes.

Actually you are solving the Differential Equation:

\frac {d^2s} {dt^2} =a
with initial conditions

\frac {ds(T)} {dt}= 27 \frac m s

\frac {ds(0)} {dt}= 0 \frac m s

s(T) =150m

s(0)=0

T is the time you need to find.

This can be solved by integration, with each integration constant evaluated using the initial conditions. So your "velocity graph" is the derivative of the "position graph" and are thus simply showing different aspects of the same physical situation.
 
The difficulty in telling you if this method works for solving the problem is that you never actually told us what the problem is! You said you did this and that but what is it you are trying to solve?
 
I gave you the info. I had, and showed my steps.

I wasn't really concerned on finding the answer. I was just curious if using certain variables into other equations to find the answer. I know you can do this, but I wasn't quite sure if you can do it with its own derivative.

I guess you can. Thanks for the advice.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top