Solving for Charge Distribution on Charged Aluminum Spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two charged aluminum spheres and the calculation of electron distribution. Part A has been solved, determining that each sphere contains approximately 7.25 x 10^24 electrons. The user struggles with Part B, which requires calculating how many electrons must be transferred between the spheres to create an attractive force of 1.00 x 10^4 N. The user applies Coulomb's Law but receives incorrect feedback from MasteringPhysics, leading to confusion about their calculations. A correction is noted regarding the force value, emphasizing the importance of accurate units in physics problems.
Gaupp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm having difficulty with a problem on MasteringPhysics (such wonderful software...) and as a last resort I'm posting on here. This is, I'm sure, a really simple problem but I'm getting no kind of feedback from MP and there isn't an example problem like this in the book.

The Problem

Two aluminum spheres of mass .025 kg are separated by 80 centimeters.

A) How many electrons does each sphere contain?

B)How many electrons would have to be removed from one sphere and added to the other to cause an attractive force between the spheres of magnitude 1.00 x 10^4 (roughly one ton)? Assume that the spheres may be treated as point charges.

C)What fraction of all the electrons in one of the spheres does this represent?

Attempted Solutions

A) I found Part A to be 7.25 x 10^24 electrons.

B) This is where I'm stuck.

If you were to remove electrons from one sphere and put them on the other I understand that their charges are to be equal but opposite, as in q1 = -q2. So using Coloumb's Law (F=K*q1*q2/(r^2)) I've set the Force to 1*10^4, divided that by K=9*10^9.

10000/(9*10^9) = q1*q2/(.8^2)

Then multiplying that by .8^2, I have just the charges on the other side of the equation. Since the charges in the formula are absolute value I can set q1=q2 and have q1^2. Taking the square root of the entire thing I have:

q=8.4327*10^-4.

So now I can use the formula q=e(#protons-#electrons). So:

8.4237*10^-4 = 1.6*10^-19(7.25*10^24-#electrons). Solving from this I get 7.249*10^24 electrons as my final answer.

However, MP says I'm wrong but there isn't any feedback as to where I went wrong, and it seems straightforward enough to me that no matter how I rework it I get the same thing every time.

Can anyone help me out here?

C) Can't do this one until B is done.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops. I think I posted this in the wrong forum. Can a mod or someone move this for me please?
 
magnitude 1.00 x 10^24 (roughly one ton)?
I think you have this wrong, one ton force = 10,000 Newtons , 10^24N is a lot of force!
 
mgb_phys said:
I think you have this wrong, one ton force = 10,000 Newtons , 10^24N is a lot of force!


Ok. Yeah I typed that in wrong. It should be 1*10^4 N. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top