Solving for Closest Approach: 2D Kinematics Help and Solutions

AI Thread Summary
A problem involving the 2D kinematics of two flocks of Canada geese flying at 25 km/hr is discussed, with one flock flying north and the other flying northwesterly. The key questions include finding the distance of closest approach, the time to reach this point, and the position vectors of both flocks relative to Kingston. Attempts to solve the problem involve setting up a distance formula and taking derivatives to find critical points. There are discrepancies in the calculations, prompting further review and corrections. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate mathematical approaches in solving kinematic problems.
Kudo Shinichi
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
Urgent!HELP!A problem on 2D kinematics

Homework Statement


A flock of Canada geese directly fly above Kingston is flying due north at a speed of 25km/hr. A second flock directly above Gananoque, 30km to the east of Kingston, is flying in a northwesterly direction at the same speed. Assume there is no wind where the geese are flying.
a)What is the distance of closest approach between the two flock
b)How long does it take to reach this point?
c)What are the position vectors of the two flocks relative to Kingston at this instant of time?

Can anyone help me? thank you very much.

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula for distance is ((30-25t/sqrt(2)) - 0)^2 + (25t - 25t/sqrt(2)) ^2 = 625t^2(3/2 - sqrt(2) + 1/4) -25 t sqrt(2) + 900
Derivative: 625t (3.5 - sqrt(2)) -25 sqrt(2). =0
t = 1/25(3.5 - sqrt(2)).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Looks like the right approach.
Kudo Shinichi said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula for distance is ((30-25t/sqrt(2)) - 0)^2 + (25t - 25t/sqrt(2)) ^2
Looks good.
= 625t^2(3/2 - sqrt(2) + 1/4) -25 t sqrt(2) + 900
Redo this step. I get a different answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top