Solving for g: Derive Equation to Find Value of Acceleration Due to Gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter MSG100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an equation to calculate the acceleration due to gravity (g) using an air track and a spring system. The proposed formula for g is g=(4pi^{2}·bL)/((T^{2}-t^{2})H), where various parameters like the extension of equilibrium, track length, and oscillation periods are defined. Participants clarify that the oscillations are linear, not pendulum-based, and emphasize the importance of using the correct forces acting on the spring, particularly considering the incline. The conversation also highlights the need to incorporate the height-to-length ratio (H/L) into the equation using trigonometric relationships. The overall goal is to refine the equation to accurately determine g based on the experimental setup.
MSG100
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I need some help with an equation.

I will use to find the value of acceleration due to gravity.

With a air track and a spring attached to a glider we should find the value of "g".
The track is inclined and with two different equilibria (which are achieved by using two different masses on the glider) we kan determined "g".

g=(4pi^{2}\cdotbL)/((T^{2}-t^{2})H)

b = the extension of equilibrium (we got it to 0.026 meters)
L = the length of the track (2 meters)
T= the time of one period with more weights on the glider (2.37 s)
t = the time one period with no extra weights on the glider (2.12 s)
H = the height of the air track (0.184 meters)


If we insert all the values we get 9.939m/s/s.

How should we derive the equation?
If we take the formula of pendulum motion we get g=(4pi^{2}\cdotL)/T^{2}

I don't seem to get any further with the equation so I need some help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is quite tricky if you've just started to study SHM.

The key thing to understand is that you're not dealing with pendulum oscillations but with oscillations in a straight line of a mass on a spring.

So the key equations are T=2\pi \sqrt \frac{m+m_0}{k} and T_0=2\pi \sqrt \frac{m_0}{k}.
The first of these is with the extra mass; the second is without. If you square these equations and subtract them you'll get something useful which doesn't involve m_0.

When you add mass to the glider the oscillations are at a lower rate, because of the inertia of the mass, not because of the extra gravitational pull on the mass. But the gravitational pull does make the glider + mass equilibrium point lower down the slope than with glider alone. If it sits a distance b lower down the slope (so the spring is extended by a further distance b) you can write a 'static' equation which links k, b, m, g, H/L. This enables you to eliminate k and m from your oscillation equation.

Good luck!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok, so I get:

k=(4pi^2*m) / (T^2-t^2)

and because Hooke's law says k = F/X (I'll use b as notation instead of X) F=mg so k=mg/b

g = (4pi^2*b) / (T^2-t^2)

How do I get the (H/L)-term into the equation?
Have it something with Sin(x)=H/L so 1/Sin(x)=L/H to do?
 
MSG100 said:
Ok, so I get:

k=(4pi^2*m) / (T^2-t^2)

Yes.

MSG100 said:
and because Hooke's law says k = F/X (I'll use b as notation instead of X) F=mg so k=mg/b

No. mg is not the force stretching the spring (at equilibrium) because the system is on a slope. The effective force stretching the spring is mg sin(θ) = mg (h/L). [Actually this is the EXTRA force due to mass m being added to the glider and b is the extra distance stretched by the spring.]

MSG100 said:
How do I get the (H/L)-term into the equation?
Have it something with Sin(x)=H/L so 1/Sin(x)=L/H to do?

Yes. See above.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
977
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K