Solving for Generators in Abelian Groups with Multiple Relations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nexus[Free-DC]
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Nexus[Free-DC]
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Okay, I'm really scratching my head here.

If an Abelian group A has three generators x,y,z and they are subject to three defining relations, say something like

x+y+z=0
x-y-z=0
2x-2y+3z=0

then I can solve for x,y,z and find A as a direct sum of cyclic groups, Z_x + Z_y + Z_z.

But what do I do if the three equations are not linearly independent? I get left with everything in terms of x and I can't just plug in the numbers.

Thanks,
N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand

There's some context missing:

Let's say you've got generators \{x,y,z\} and the relations:
xy=yx
yz=zy
and
zx=xz
Which are equivalent to the claim that the group is abelian.

Now we add the following relations:
0=0

So at this point, this group is equivalent to \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} and the system of defining relations is clearly not linearly independant.
 
you probably oughtn't to confuse additive and multiplicative notation in the same thread
 
nexus, you are talking about a representation of your abelian group as a cokernel of a map which is not necessarily injective.

by the way your example is non sense as your groupo as described is zero.

i.e. you gave so many relations that everything was trivial.

In general if you have n generators, that emans you map a direct sum of n copies of Z onto the group. then telling what say r relations are, is giving a generating set for the kernel of that map, hence it let's you map another direct sum of r copies of Z onto the kernel.


So now you have a linear map from r copies of Z, to n copies of Z, given by a matrix of integers. and your group is the cokernel of this map.

To get the explicit structure of the group, you just diagonalize the matrix using row and column operations. Then you can easily see the group structure, as the quotient of the direct sums then becoems the direct sum of the quotients of the diagonal maps, i.e. one dimensional maps.

this is the usual proof of the structure theorem for finitely generated abelian groups.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top