Solving for Spring Constant in Hooke's Law with Charged Spheres

  • Thread starter Thread starter psilovethomas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the spring constant in the scenario involving charged spheres and Hooke's Law, the relevant forces must be analyzed. The upward force on the charged sphere is due to the electrostatic attraction from the two negatively charged spheres, while the downward force is the restoring force of the spring. The spring stretches 5.0 cm from its equilibrium position, indicating a balance between these forces. The equation µΔx = k(Qq)/r is applied, where Q is the charge of the two negatively charged spheres, and r is the distance between charges. Gravity is assumed negligible due to the small size of the charges.
psilovethomas
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A tiny sphere with a charge of q = +8.8 µC is attached to a spring. Two other tiny charged spheres, each with a charge of −4.0-µC, are placed in the positions shown in the figure, in which b = 4.1 cm. The spring stretches 5.0 cm from its previous equilibrium position toward the two spheres. Calculate the spring constant.
Here is the figure:
http://www.webassign.net/grr/p16-16alt.gif

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



µΔx=k(Qq)/r
 
Physics news on Phys.org
psilovethomas said:

Homework Statement



A tiny sphere with a charge of q = +8.8 µC is attached to a spring. Two other tiny charged spheres, each with a charge of −4.0-µC, are placed in the positions shown in the figure, in which b = 4.1 cm. The spring stretches 5.0 cm from its previous equilibrium position toward the two spheres. Calculate the spring constant.
Here is the figure:
http://www.webassign.net/grr/p16-16alt.gif

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



µΔx=k(Qq)/r

they are saying tiny charges so I guess we can assume gravity does not play a role.

What force is pulling the charge up and what force is pulling the charge down when it is in equilibrium after stretching?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top