Solving for the Missing Factor: Jumping into a Non-Rotating Black Hole

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cozycoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
cozycoz
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
I'm reading Lambourne's <Relativity, Gravitation and Cosmology>, and I cannot get a result the book describes. It's on equation (6.7) in 173p.

When a person free-falls into a non-rotating black hole from ##r=r_0## to some position ##r=r'##, the proper time becomes
$$τ(r')-τ(r_0)=\frac{r_0}{c}\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}[\frac{π}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0}(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})}+\arctan(-\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0-r'}})].$$

Now we can simplify the above by taking the limits of ##r_0>>r'##.
First, using ##\arctan{x}=x+O(x^3)##,
$$\arctan(-\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0-r'}})=-\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0-r'}}+O[(-\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0-r'}})^3],$$
and here, for
$$\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0-r'}}=\sqrt{\frac{\frac{r'}{r_0}}{1-\frac{r'}{r_0}}} << 1,$$
we can ignore ##O(x^3)##. Then
$$\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0}(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})}+\arctan(-\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0-r'}})$$ $$≈\frac{r_0}{c}\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}[\frac{π}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0}}(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{1}{2}}-\sqrt{\frac{r'}{r_0}}(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})^{-\frac{1}{2}}].$$

By using
$$(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{1}{2}}≈1-\frac{r'}{r_0}$$ $$(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})^{-\frac{1}{2}}≈1+\frac{r'}{r_0},$$
I get
$$τ(r')-τ(r_0)=\frac{r_0}{c}\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}[\frac{π}{2}-(\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{3}{2}}].$$
This is my result, but the book says

$$τ(r')-τ(r_0)=\frac{r_0}{c}\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}[\frac{π}{2}-\frac{2}{3}(\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{3}{2}}].$$

Where did the factor ##\frac{2}{3}## come from?
 
on Phys.org
$$(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{1}{2}}≈1-\frac{r'}{r_0}$$ This is missing a factor 1/2 for the fraction on the right side. Same for the following equation.

You probably have to consider the x3 term of the arctan. The leading term of the argument to the third power has the same power as your result.
 
cozycoz said:
$$τ(r')-τ(r_0)=\frac{r_0}{c}\sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}}[\frac{π}{2}-\frac{2}{3}(\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{3}{2}}].$$

There's something strange about that result. An alternative derivation of the ##r_0 \gg r_S## case is as follows:

Start with the equation:

##(\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 = c^2 [ \frac{E}{mc^2} - 1 + \frac{r_s}{r}]##

##E## turns out to be the constant value of the expression ##mc^2 (1 - \frac{r_s}{r}) \frac{dt}{d\tau}##. If the object drops from ##r_0 \gg r_S##, then ##E \approx mc^2##. So the equation simplifies to:

##(\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 = c^2 [ \frac{r_s}{r}]##

This has the exact solution:

##\tau = \frac{r_0}{c} \sqrt{\frac{r_0}{r_S}} (1 - (\frac{r}{r_0})^{\frac{3}{2}})##

There is no ##\pi/2##. With the choice ##E = mc^2##, there is no trigonometric functions involved, it's just rational powers of ##r##.

One way to see that this equation works is that in the limit ##r \rightarrow r_0##, ##\tau \rightarrow 0##.
 
mfb said:
$$(1-\frac{r'}{r_0})^{\frac{1}{2}}≈1-\frac{r'}{r_0}$$ This is missing a factor 1/2 for the fraction on the right side. Same for the following equation.

You probably have to consider the x3 term of the arctan. The leading term of the argument to the third power has the same power as your result.
I omitted ##\frac{1}{2}## only here. I actually calculated with it so it changes nothing, sorry for the mistake!

But I've done considering ##x^3## term and got ##\frac{2}{3}## factor. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K