Solving for Time Taken to Slide Down Roof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanessa23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sliding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time taken for a ball to slide down a roof, starting from a height of 12.5 meters and rolling a distance of 8.14 meters at a 40-degree angle. The calculations provided yield a final velocity of 9.84 m/s and an acceleration of 3.39 m/s², resulting in a time of 2.90 seconds for the ball to slide down. However, a key point raised is the distinction between "rolling" and "sliding," suggesting that the problem may have been misinterpreted. If the ball is indeed rolling, additional information about its properties, such as whether it is solid or hollow, is necessary for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of clarifying the type of motion involved in physics problems.
Vanessa23
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a ball started at a height of 12.5 meters and rolled to the edge of a roof which is at 7 meters. Using a^2+b^2=c^2 we know it rolled a distance of 8.14 meters on the roof because it rolled a horizontal distance of 6m and a vertical distance of 5.5m. Find the time it rolled down the roof. The roof makes a 40deg angle with the horizontal and coeff of friction is .388.

Homework Equations


Potential E=KE+Ffriction
mg*distance*sin(theta)=.5mv^2+(coeff of friction)*mgcos(theta)*distance down roof
acceleration=g*sin(theta)-g*(coeff. of friction)*cos(theta)
V=Vo+at

The Attempt at a Solution



8.14*g*sin(40)=.5v^2+.388*g*cos(40)*(8.14)
v=9.84m/s

a=g*sin40)-g*.388cos(40)
a=3.39m/s^2

9.84=3.39t
t=2.90 seconds
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vanessa23 said:
a ball started at a height of 12.5 meters and rolled to the edge of a roof ...
... we know it rolled a distance of 8.14 meters on the roof because it rolled a horizontal distance of 6m and a vertical distance of 5.5m. Find the time it rolled down the roof. ...

What you have solved is for sliding down the roof whereas, the question has reiterated the term rolling. I think, question has been manipulated, in your own words!

The attempt is correct, method-wise, if it is sliding. So, have you written 'sliding' incorrectly?
If it is indeed 'rolling', one information is missing: information about the ball? Assuming a spherical ball (as most of them are), is it solid or hollow? Have you missed that?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top