Solving for velocity for a body with distance varying force

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the velocity and displacement of a body under the influence of a constant force, a time-varying force, and a distance-varying force, one can treat each force separately and add their accelerations. The constant force gives a straightforward acceleration of F/m, while the time-varying force requires integration of F(t) over time to find velocity. For the distance-varying force, a second-order differential equation can be established, leading to a relationship between velocity and force as v = sqrt(2/m ∫ F(x)dx. If the distance varying force is only known through discrete values, numerical methods may be necessary to approximate the integrals involved. The complexity of the integrals can vary significantly, especially for non-elementary functions like those arising from inverse square laws.
Zexter
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I have three forces acting on a body
1. a constant force
2. a time varying force
3. a distance varying force

So If I need to calculate the velocity and displacement of the body at any particular time what method should I follow?Is there any general procedure to solve such an equation. Since time varying force changes the displacement of the body, the body is made to move in the distance varying force field...


Another bad thing is that I have only discrete values of my distance varying force and not an equation describing it. So it would be helpful if someone gives me a clue to how to solve this problem


thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you are not giving us much to go on! Fortunately, F= ma is "linear" so we can treat each force separately then add the accelerations. For constant F, a is just F/m. For F varying with time, we have
a= \frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{F(t)}{m}
so that
v= \frac{1}{m}\int F(t)dt

If F is a function of x, we need to say that a= d^2x/dt^2 so we have a second order differential equation:
m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= F(x)
Since t does not appear expicitely in that equation, a standard method of solving is "quadrature". Let v= dx/dt so that
\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= \frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{dx}{dt}\frac{dv}{dx}= v\frac{dv}{dt}
by the chain rule.
That is, the equation is
mv\frac{dv}{dx}= F(x)
so that
\int mv dv= \frac{1}{2}mv^2= \int F(x)dx
and
v= \sqrt{\frac{2}{m}\int F(x)dx.

For general F, even if you can integrate F(x), the integral for x can be non-elementary. For example, with an inverse square law, you get what are called "elliptic integrals" (since the integrals are involved in finding the orbits of planets) which cannot be integrated in terms of elementary functions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top