Solving for Velocity with Constant Acceleration Equation | Simple Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter LogicX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using the constant acceleration equation to calculate velocity when dropping a rock from a height of 4 meters. The initial velocity is zero, and the acceleration due to gravity is taken as negative, resulting in a calculated velocity of -8.85 m/s, which raises questions about the sign convention. Participants clarify that the negative sign indicates direction, with downward motion considered negative, and that velocity should reflect this direction after calculations. The conversation also touches on the importance of understanding the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration in motion. Ultimately, the correct application of signs is crucial for accurate results in physics problems involving motion.
LogicX
Messages
175
Reaction score
1
I am using an equation for constant acceleration to find velocity.

v^2=v(initial)^2+2a(x-x(initial))

Dropping a rock from 4 meters to the ground. Initial velocity is 0, a=9.8, and displacement is -4.

So v^2=2(9.8)(-4), and it SHOULD equal=-8.85m/s (I know this is the correct answer, I already got it right on my homework).

The velocity should be negative. But obviously my above answer is impossible because you can't take the square root of a negative. When using these constant acceleration equations I make the addition sign in the above equation negative if it is going upward (makes sense since gravity is working against it), and positive if it is going downward . Do I apply the negative sign after I solve, to show the direction? That just doesn't seem right.

Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LogicX said:
I am using an equation for constant acceleration to find velocity.

v^2=v(initial)^2+2a(x-x(initial))

Dropping a rock from 4 meters to the ground.

You are measuring with respect to the ground, initially it is 4m above ground so x0=4. At the ground x=0, so you are finding 'v' at x=0.

So you'll get v2= 2(-9.81)(0-4)
 
Why is 9.8 negative? And in the problem, the answer had to be negative in order to get the correct answer for a later part. Here, why don't I just post the whole thing:

To test the quality of a tennis ball, you drop it onto the floor from a height of 4.00 m. It rebounds to a height of 2.00 m. If the ball is in contact with the floor for 12.0 ms, what is its average acceleration during that contact?

The answer is 1.26x10^3m/s^2

So I got the answer I already posted for descent, 8.85, then figured out the velocity for ascent, which is 6.26. Then the average acceleration is change in velocity over the time it was in contact with the floor. In order to get the right answer 8.85 had to be negative so you could have:

(6.26+8.85)/.012=1.26x10^3. One of those velocities has to be negative, no matter how you cut it, and you have to take a square root to get both of them. So what is going on?

EDIT: Velocity is the derivative of position, and if the graph of the function is decreasing then the graph of its derivative is negative. So it WOULD seem that you apply the sign after you do the calculation, based on the fact that taking a square root of something means you end up with two answers, +/-.
 
Last edited:
LogicX said:
Why is 9.8 negative?

In the entire motion, you have both upward and downward motion. You needed to take a direction a positive. I took down as negative, so a=-9.81 m/s2.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top