Solving for Volume: Triple Integral of Wedge in Cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a triple integral to find the volume of a wedge taken from a cylinder, specifically comparing two integrals with different limits of integration. The subject area includes calculus and integral calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of changing the limits of integration and question the validity of taking a factor of 2 out of the integral. There is also confusion regarding the interpretation of the integral results and the conditions under which they apply.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the reasoning behind the integral evaluations and the assumptions made about the regions of integration. Some guidance has been offered regarding the behavior of the cosine function over different intervals, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a known cross-section and specific angles, as well as the context of homework constraints, which may influence the approach taken by participants.

schaefera
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why does 2*Integral (r dz dr dt) for 0<z<rcos(t), 0<r<a, 0<t<pi/2 equal (2a^3)/3, when Integral (r dz dr dt) for 0<z<rcos(t), 0<r<a, 0<t<pi equal 0? All you are doing is using the fact that rcos(t) is an even function to make the limits easier, right?


Homework Equations


I'm practicing finding the volume of a known cross section with a wedge taken out from a cylinder at an angle of pi/4 radians; and I'm using the triple integral to check me work.


The Attempt at a Solution


My question more arose out of confusion than it being an assigned problem, but I can't quite figure it out!
Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just because the integral of cos(t) over 0<t<pi/2 is 1. And the integral of cos(t) over 0<t<pi is 0. cos(t) is negative on (pi/2,pi).
 
So to do this problem is it ok to take that 2 out and double the region of 0 to pi/2 because we want volume, which obviously can't be 0?
 
schaefera said:
So to do this problem is it ok to take that 2 out and double the region of 0 to pi/2 because we want volume, which obviously can't be 0?

I have no idea. What problem are you actually trying to solve??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K