Solving for Work Done When Accelerating a Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating work done on an object with an initial velocity of 0 m/s, mass of 8.4 kg, traveling 0.495 m in 0.1625 seconds. The acceleration is calculated to be 37.495 m/s², leading to a final velocity of 6.09375 m/s. The work done is computed as 155.925 joules, assuming constant acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of significant figures in reporting results and suggest algebraic methods for improved accuracy and clarity. The conversation also notes that varying the acceleration pattern could reduce the work required for the same motion.
Jay529
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Need help checking my work and appropriate use of equations.
Relevant Equations
acceleration: s=ut + 1/2 ut^2, final velocity: V= u+at, work done: W=1/2 mv^2
I wanted to make sure these were the correct equations to use for they were not given. I had to research to get this far and only had the below statement to go off.

The problem is an object with initial velocity = "0." It travels 0.495m in 0.1625sec and weights 8.4 kg
or
Initial velocity (u) = 0 m/s, Mass (m) = 8.4 kg, Distance (s) = 0.495 m, Time (t) = 0.1625

Solving for acceleration: 0.495 = 0 + 1/2 * a (0.1625)^2
a= (2*0.495)/ 0.1625^2 = 37.495m/sec^2

Now that I have acceleration
Calculate final velocity: V= 37.495 * .01625 = 6.09375m/s

Solving for Work done: W=1/2 * 8.4 * 6.09375^2 = .5 * 8.4 * 37.125 = 155.925 joules
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming constant acceleration. Is that given?
 
haruspex said:
You are assuming constant acceleration. Is that given?
Yes, I believe.
 
Last edited:
Jay529 said:
Yes, I believe.
Then I get the same result to four significant figures. The mass is only given to two significant figures, so really that is all you can give in the answer.
Had you worked algebraically you would have got some cancellation: ##2m(\frac st)^2##. That allows you to check that the result is dimensionally correct and can improve accuracy. It has many other advantages. It is certainly easier for others to follow.

Btw, if the acceleration pattern can be anything you choose, the motion can be achieved using a quarter of the work.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top