Solving for X (grph.calculator needed?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wa1337
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
To solve the equation x³ + 2x² - 11x - 6 = 0, a graphing calculator is typically used to find the roots, as the equation does not factor into whole numbers. The rational root theorem is suggested, but it may not be effective in this case. Without access to a graphing calculator, the cubic formula can be applied, although it is more complex than the quadratic formula. The discussion emphasizes the challenges of solving cubic equations without proper tools. Ultimately, using a graphing calculator is recommended for accurately determining the roots.
Wa1337
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve For x: x3 + 2x2 - 11x = 6


Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I got to x3 + 2x2 - 11x - 6 = 0

It says to list the windows I work with (using a graphing calculator). I am unable to since I don't have one and won't be assigned one until the school year starts. How do I go about solving this function for zeros.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This equation doesn't factor into whole numbers. :( Using the graphing calculator, you would graph it and then use the trace tool to find the roots. I believe there is a formula for cubic equations that is kind of like the quadratic equation but more complicated, but I don't know what it is.
 
Alright thank you. Will try and report back if I can :)
 
ArcanaNoir said:
This equation doesn't factor into whole numbers. :( Using the graphing calculator, you would graph it and then use the trace tool to find the roots. I believe there is a formula for cubic equations that is kind of like the quadratic equation but more complicated, but I don't know what it is.

gb7nash said:
Try the rational root theorem:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_root_theorem

If that doesn't work and you can't use iterative methods (which probably won't give you exact roots), it's cubic formula for you.

I'm afraid the Rational root theorem doesn't work in this case.
And the formula for cubic equations is pretty messy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_function

I'm afraid graphic calculator it is! :wink:
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K