Solving Forced Wave Equation with Causal Boundary Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickthequick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the forced wave equation u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx} = f''(x)g(t) with a specific forcing function f(x,t) = e^{-t/T}(\alpha_o + \alpha_1 Tanh(-\frac{(x-x_o)}{L}). The user seeks to determine if solutions can be constructed using a Green's function approach based on impulse forcing solutions. An alternative method involving the change of variables to v = x + ct and w = x - ct is suggested, which simplifies the integration process. However, the user encounters a divergent solution when applying the method of characteristics and seeks clarification on whether the integrals should be definite or if they are merely anti-derivatives.
nickthequick
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I want to solve the forced wave equation

u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx} = f''(x)g(t)

(primes denote derivatives wrt x). The forcing I am interested in is

f(x,t)= e^{-t/T} (\alpha_o+\alpha_1 Tanh(-\frac{(x-x_o)}{L}).

I also am imposing causality, i.e. u =0 for t<0.

In the case where g(t) = \delta (t) I know that the solution is

u = \frac{1}{2c} \left[ f'(x-c|t|) - f'(x+ct) \right]

My question is, can I build up the solutions to my particular type of time dependence through a Green's function type method from the case of impulse forcing?

My other approach would be via spectral methods but the inverse Fourier transform is quite complicated.


Any help is appreciated,

Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Change the independent variables from x, t to v = x+ct and w=x-ct. In these coordinates the left hand side is uvw, and all you have to do is integrate both sides wrt v and then wrt w.
 
Excellent exploitation of the symmetry of the governing equation!

Thanks for pointing this out Bill_K
 
Using this method of characteristics, I can integrate the forcing twice (once wrt w and once wrt to v) but I end up finding a divergent solution. Am I just taking the anti-derivatives of the forcing function twice or are these definite integrals that depend on the geometry of (v,w) space?

PS This is the equation I end up finding in (x,t) space

u(x,y)= 2\omega\Delta \mathcal{E} e^{\frac{-c_g^2t}{cL}}\left\{\sum_n (-1)^{n+1} \frac{e^{\frac{2x}{L}(n+1)}}{n+1 -\alpha}\left(c_g^2\frac{1-\alpha}{n+1-\alpha} + c_g(c_g-2c)\frac{\alpha}{n+\alpha}\right)\right.[\tex]\left.+2c(c_g-2c)\left(2+4\sum_n (-1)^{n+1}\frac{\alpha+1}{\alpha+1+n} e^{\frac{2x}{L}(n+1)} - Tanh{\frac{x}{L}}\right)\right\}
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...

Similar threads

Back
Top