Solving Fractions: How to Solve x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013)

  • Thread starter Thread starter martine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
No homework, just a problem I'm faced with at work. And being the granny I am, this is ages ago since I solved anything like this.


x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013)

The solution to this is 17.6. The question is: how do I solve such equations for x? If I ignore the 36 on the left side and asume it's not a fraction it's no problem, but um.. this is too long ago.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is the left hand side \frac{x}{36-x} or \frac{x}{36} - x ? I'm not sure where the fraction ends.
In the first case multiplying both sides by 36-x will get you rid of the fraction, in the second case multiply with 36. Then you can use addition and subtraction to solve for x.

But no matter how i put the parenthesis in your equation i do not get the solution 17.6.
 
first add all like term like the one whit out the x, then isolate for x, then you will have the answer.
 
martine said:
No homework, just a problem I'm faced with at work. And being the granny I am, this is ages ago since I solved anything like this.


x/36-x = 12/36-12 + 3.013/0.20(36-3.013)

The solution to this is 17.6. The question is: how do I solve such equations for x? If I ignore the 36 on the left side and asume it's not a fraction it's no problem, but um.. this is too long ago.
What you have written is straightforward and unambiguous, but it might not mean what you intend. Writing fractional expressions as text on one line requires the use of parentheses for numerators or denominators that have multiple terms.

For x/36 - x, did you mean (x/36) - x or x/(36 - x)?
For 12/36 - 12 did you mean (12/36) - 12 or 12/(36 - 12)? The first is a negative number; the value of the second is 1/2.

For 3.013/0.20(36-3.013), did you mean (3.013/0.20) * (36 - 3.013) or 3.013/(0.20 *(36 - 3.013))?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top