Solving Function Problems: Intersection and Cardinality | Tips and Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter binks01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
binks01
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The first question I have is simple, but when I attempted it, I got stuck.

I'm trying to prove that if f:X->Y and A & B are subsets of X, that f(A intersect B) is a subset of f(A) intersect f(B).

I started by trying to show set containment, beginning with an arbitrary element in f(A intersect B). However, I cannot figure out how to transition into the right hand side of the problem.

----------------------------

The second question I have is proving that if A and B are finite sets having the same cardinality and f:A->B is one-to-one then f is onto.

I missed class this day and can't figure out what cardinality is by reading the chapter.

Someone please help! =\
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. If y \in f(A \cap B), then \exists x \in A \cap B such that f(x) = y. Then...

2. The cardinality of a set is its "size". The cardinality of a finite set is the number of elements in it. Since A and B are finite sets having the same cardinality, |A| = |B| = n for some natural number n.
 
How do you use |A| = |B| = n to prove f is onto?
 
binks01 said:
How do you use |A| = |B| = n to prove f is onto?

What have you tried so far? What happens if it isn't onto? In other words what happens if there is an element of B that is not mapped to by any element of A?
 
Precise answer depends on used finite set definition.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top