Solving Hard Inequalities: 1/(x+4)>x-4 & 1/(x+7)>x-7

  • Thread starter Thread starter alewisGB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Inequalities
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequalities 1/(x+4)>x-4 and 1/(x+7)>x-7, it is essential to eliminate the fractions by multiplying both sides by the square of the denominator to avoid changing the inequality sign. The discussion demonstrates how to simplify the inequality to a polynomial form, leading to the expression 0>(x+2)(x^2-5). The key takeaway is that the product of these factors can only be negative if one or more of the factors are negative, guiding the solution to find the intervals for x. The final result indicates that x must be less than -√5 and between -2 and 5. Understanding this method will aid in solving similar inequalities in the future.
alewisGB
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am looking at questions like
1/(x+4)>x-4
or 1/(x+7)>x-7
I have no idea how to solve them,
I have simplified to (-x^2+50) /(7+x)
however I don't think it is correct and I don't know what do do from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi alewisGB! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

obviously, you need to get rid of the fraction!

in an ordinary equation, you'd just multiply both sides by the denominator

but that might be negative (which would change the > to <),

so, instead, multiply both sides by the square of the denominator …

what do you get? :smile:
 
for:
1/(x+2)>x-2
Step 1: x+2>x3+2x2-4x-8
Step 2: 0>x3+2x2-5x-10
Step 3: 0>(x+2)(x2-5)
Step 4: if 0=(x+2)(x2-5)
x = -2 or +√5 or -√5
Step 5: Unsure, do input -2.01 and -1.99 and see which one is true? (same for +or-√5) or do I do something else
 
hi alewisGB! :smile:

this way is easier :wink:

1/(x+2)>x-2
Step 1: x+2>(x+2)(x2-4)
Step 3: 0>(x+2)(x2-5)
Step 4: 0>(x+√5)(x+2)(x-√5)

… and you now have this in the form 0 > (x-a)(x-b)(x-c) with a<b<c,

sooo … ? :smile:
 
I have got the answer of -√5 > x and 5 > x > -2
I have not done further maths and although inequalities were covered they were not nearly this complex
I have not seen the rule "0 > (x-a)(x-b)(x-c) with a<b<c"
So I am not sure what that means
Thank you for your help :)
 
alewisGB said:
I have not seen the rule "0 > (x-a)(x-b)(x-c) with a<b<c"
So I am not sure what that means

oh, that's easy

the RHS is the product of three numbers,

and it can only be negative if one or all three of them are negative,

which means either x < a or b < x < c :wink:
 
Thank you ever so much, you have no idea how grateful I am. This will help me in now but also in the future :)
 
Back
Top