Solving Hydrostatic Forces with Integral or Volume/Weight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a fluid mechanics problem related to hydrostatic forces, specifically whether a vertical component of force acts upward on a dam. While integration is a viable method for solving the problem, there is uncertainty about the existence of this vertical component. It is noted that pressure acts normal to the surface, implying that if the surface has a vertical normal vector, the pressure force will also have a vertical component. A suggested approach is to express the normal vector as a function of x or y to facilitate integration. Overall, understanding the geometry of the problem is crucial for determining the appropriate method of solution.
Link-
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
I am actually trying to solve a problem from fluid mechanics. The especifications of the problem are on the attachment.

I can solve the problem easily by integration, but I'm not so sure if there is a vertical component of a force in the "dam" acting upward. There is a vertical component of the force acting upward?
If there is, there is another method to solve the problem without integration, using properties such as volume, specific weight... to find that vertical component?
 

Attachments

  • scan2.jpg
    scan2.jpg
    13.2 KB · Views: 429
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the various parts of your drawing represent. However, in general, pressure always acts normal to the surface. So if the normal vector of your surface at a given point has a vertical component then the pressure force will also have a vertical component. The easiest way to do something like this is to write an expression for the normal vector as a function of x (or y) and then use that in the integration.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top