Solving inclined plane in different axis.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the acceleration of a block on an inclined plane using different coordinate axes. While the user successfully calculates acceleration with axes aligned to the incline, they struggle with horizontal and vertical axes due to confusion over vertical forces not summing to zero. It is clarified that the acceleration of the block has a vertical component, necessitating a more complex approach when using horizontal and vertical axes. The solution involves incorporating the constraint that acceleration is parallel to the incline. Ultimately, the user successfully resolves the problem with this understanding.
tousif1995
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I can work out the acceleration of a block that will take along the plane when the axes are the ones along and perpendicular to the inclined plane. But, when I choose a horizontal and vertical axis I end up with the same mistake as this guy in this thread did:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=238180

In that thread, it is said that the vertical forces don't add up to zero. I don't get it and hence I cannot solve the problem when the axis is horizontal and vertical. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tousif1995 said:
In that thread, it is said that the vertical forces don't add up to zero. I don't get it and hence I cannot solve the problem when the axis is horizontal and vertical. Can anyone help?
The acceleration of the block is parallel to the incline, so it will have a vertical component. So the vertical forces on the block cannot sum to zero.

Obviously, it's much easier to solve the problem using coordinates aligned parallel and perpendicular to the surface. But if you insist, you can solve it using vertical and horizontal axes. It just takes a bit more work, since you must add the constraint that the acceleration is parallel to the surface.
 
Thank you!

masinθ = -(Rcosθ-mg)
Rsin = macosθ

Just solved it! feels good :cool:
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top