Solving Integral Equation for u(x)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving an integral equation for the function u(x), expressed as 0 = e^{2∫u(x)dx} + u(x)e^{∫u(x)dx} - a(x). The discussion centers around the nature of the equation and the implications of the function a(x).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods, including the quadratic formula and converting the equation into a differential equation. Some question the limits of integration and the implications of a(x) on the solution. Others suggest using Green's functions for approximation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing different perspectives on how to approach the problem. There is acknowledgment that the solution is heavily dependent on the function a(x), and while some methods have been proposed, there is no consensus on a definitive approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the nature of a(x) significantly influences the solvability of the equation, with examples provided to illustrate how different forms of a(x) lead to different types of solutions.

foxjwill
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve for u(x):

0 = e^{2\int u(x) dx} + u(x) e^{\int u(x) dx} - a(x)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using the quadratic formula,

e^{\int u(x) dx} = \frac{-u(x) \pm \sqrt{u^2(x) + 4a(x)}}{2}

, converting to log notation and differentiating, but from there I didn't know how to solve for u(x). I thought maybe I could use something on the lines of the log-definitions of the inverse trig functions. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what are the limits on the integration? if they are fixed then \int dx u(x) is just a number (call it C) and
<br /> u=(a-e^{2 C})/e^{C}<br />
 
You could convert it to a differential equation and try to solve this, however it turns out that this new differential equation is severely determined by the unknown function a(x). In order to do this, set:

e^{\int u(x)dx}=f(x)

Thus:

u(x)=\frac{1}{f(x)}\frac{df(x)}{dx}

And putting this into the equation gives:

\frac{df(x)}{dx}+[f(x)]^2=a(x)

This is a Riccati equation, which can be transformed into a linear one by transforming:

f(x)=\frac{1}{u(x)}\frac{du(x)}{dx}

So:

\frac{df(x)}{dx}=-\frac{1}{[u(x)]^2}\left(\frac{du(x)}{dx}\right)^2 +\frac{1}{u(x)} \frac{d^2u(x)}{dx^2}

The equation becomes:

\frac{d^2u(x)}{dx^2}-u(x)\cdot a(x)=0

And this one can be solved if a(x) is known. P.e. a(x)=-1 gives sin and cos functions, a(x)=x gives airy functions, a(x)=1 gives hyperbolic ones, etc.

This might be the complete wrong idea, but I don't see it in another way.

[Edit] Someone was faster...
 
coomast said:
You could convert it to a differential equation and try to solve this, however it turns out that this new differential equation is severely determined by the unknown function a(x). In order to do this, set:

e^{\int u(x)dx}=f(x)

Thus:

u(x)=\frac{1}{f(x)}\frac{df(x)}{dx}

And putting this into the equation gives:

\frac{df(x)}{dx}+[f(x)]^2=a(x)

This is a Riccati equation, which can be transformed into a linear one by transforming:

f(x)=\frac{1}{u(x)}\frac{du(x)}{dx}

So:

\frac{df(x)}{dx}=-\frac{1}{[u(x)]^2}\left(\frac{du(x)}{dx}\right)^2 +\frac{1}{u(x)} \frac{d^2u(x)}{dx^2}

The equation becomes:

\frac{d^2u(x)}{dx^2}-u(x)\cdot a(x)=0

And this one can be solved if a(x) is known. P.e. a(x)=-1 gives sin and cos functions, a(x)=x gives airy functions, a(x)=1 gives hyperbolic ones, etc.

This might be the complete wrong idea, but I don't see it in another way.

[Edit] Someone was faster...

Actually, I got the integral equation by trying to solve

\frac{d^2u(x)}{dx^2}-u(x)\cdot a(x)=0
 
foxjwill, to my knowledge there is no solution in terms of a(x). As I pointed out the solution depends so heavily on this function a(x) that you can't solve it without knowing it explicitly. The few examples I gave did show this, no? A sin or cos function compared to a hyperbolic one or even an Airy function (which is closely related to the functions of Bessel) are so different, even for the simple assumed functions of a(x) equal to -1, 1 and x. Maybe there is an explicit integral representation of the solution, but I think it will be closely related to the one you originally posted.
 
also, you could try using Green's functions and getting an approximation... the utility of this approach probably depends on the form of a(x). E.g., find the "homogeneous" solutions
<br /> \frac{d^2 f}{dx^2}=0<br />
and the "free" green's function
<br /> \frac{d^2}{dx^2}G(x,x&#039;)=\delta(x-x&#039;)<br />
and then consider the term
<br /> u(x)a(x)<br />
as an inhomogeneous term so that the "solution" is given by
<br /> u(x)=f(x)+\int dx&#039; G(x,x&#039;)a(x&#039;)u(x&#039;)<br />

Then, supposing u(x) is only a little different from f(x) once can develop succesive approximations for u(x) as
<br /> u(x)\approx f(x) + \int dx&#039; G(x,x&#039;)a(x&#039;)f(x&#039;)+\int dx&#039; G(x,x&#039;)a(x&#039;)\int dx&#039;&#039; G(x&#039;,x&#039;&#039;)a(x&#039;&#039;)f(x&#039;&#039;)+\ldots<br />
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K