Solving Linear Homogeneous ODEs with Variable Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter foxjwill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding general solutions to linear homogeneous ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with variable coefficients. Participants explore various methods and approaches to tackle such equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a method involving a function u(x) to simplify the ODE, while others question the validity of this approach and suggest that it may not satisfy all conditions. Some participants mention alternative methods like series solutions and express concerns about the complexity of these methods.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the completeness and applicability of the proposed method. There is acknowledgment of the limitations of certain approaches, and some participants express a preference for avoiding series solutions while considering the use of transforms.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there are specific cases where Laplace and Fourier transforms may not be applicable for solving linear ODEs with variable coefficients, indicating a need for further exploration of the topic.

foxjwill
Messages
350
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is there a standard method for finding the general solution to any given linear homogeneous ODE?

I tried working it out myself. Here's what I tried. I'm almost positive it's wrong because it doesn't take into account most of the coefficients. But maybe I'm on the right track?

The Attempt at a Solution


a_0(x)y + a_1(x)y' + \cdots + a_{n-1}(x)y^{(n-1)} + y^{(n)} = b(x)\qquad\qquad\qquad(1)​

Now, recall that the product rule for derivatives of order n is

\frac{d^n}{dx^n}[f(x)g(x)] = {\sum^n_{k=0} \binom{n}{k} f^{(k)}(x)g^{(n-k)}}(x).​

We want to find some function u(x) that, when multiplied to both sides of (1), will put the left side in the form of the nth degree product rule. In other words,

u(x)a_0(x)y + u(x)a_1(x)y' + \cdots + u(x)y^{(n)} = \frac{d^n}{dx^n}[u(x)y]\qquad\qquad\qquad(2)​

After expanding (2), we can set each term of the left side equal to the corresponding term on the right (e.g. u(x)a_2(x) y' = u^{(n-1)}(x)y' ) and, after canceling out the all the y's, form a system. Also note that since u(x)y^{(n)} appears on both sides of (2) it cancels out. From here until I say otherwise, all functions will be referenced, for convenience, without the "(x)" appended to it.

<br /> \left \{<br /> \begin{array}{lcl}<br /> u^{(n)} &amp;=&amp; u a_0\\<br /> u^{(n-1)} &amp;=&amp; \dbinom{n}{1} u a_1\\<br /> &amp; \vdots\\<br /> u&#039;&#039; &amp;=&amp; \dbinom{n}{n-2} u a_{n-2}\\<br /> u&#039; &amp;=&amp; \dbinom{n}{n-1} u a_{n-1}\\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right .<br /> \qquad\qquad\qquad(3)​


Rearranging (3), we have

<br /> \left \{<br /> \begin{array}{lcl}<br /> \dfrac{u^{n}}{u^{(n-1)}} &amp;=&amp; \dfrac{a_1}{a_0} \\<br /> \\<br /> \dfrac{u^{(n-1)}}{u^{(n-2)}} &amp;=&amp; \dbinom{n}{1} \dfrac{a_2}{a_1}\\<br /> &amp; \vdots\\<br /> \dfrac{u&#039;&#039;&#039;}{u&#039;&#039;} &amp;=&amp; \dbinom{n}{n-2} \dfrac{a_{n-2}}{a_{n-3}}\\<br /> \\<br /> \dfrac{u&#039;&#039;}{u&#039;} &amp;=&amp; \dbinom{n}{n-1} \dfrac{a_{n-1}}{a_{n-2}}\\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right .<br /> \qquad\qquad\qquad(4)​


Solving each equation in (4), we get

u^{(k)} = e^{\binom{n}{n-k} {\int \frac{a_{n-k}}{a_{n-(k+1)}}dx }}.​


Setting k=0,

u(x) = e^{\int \frac{a_n(x)}{a_{n-1}(x)}dx}\qquad\qquad\qquad(5)​


Now, going back to (1) and (2), since, by definition,

\frac{d^n}{dx^n}[u(x)y] = u(x)b(x),​

we can plug in (5),
\frac{d^n}{dx^n}\left[ e^{\int \frac{a_n(x)}{a_{n-1}(x)}dx} y \right] = e^{\int \frac{a_n(x)}{a_{n-1}(x)}dx}b(x)\qquad\qquad\qquad(6)​

and then antidifferentiate, which, at the moment, I am feeling too lazy to actually do.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are there not various methods to solve first order ODE's with constant coefficients such as variables are separable,integrating factor and such?
 
rock.freak667 said:
Are there not various methods to solve first order ODE's with constant coefficients such as variables are separable,integrating factor and such?

Yes, but I was wondering about methods to solve general degree ODE's with variable coefficients.
 
You have introduced one function u(x) and you also have n equations in equation (3).

In general your solution for k=0, i.e. equation (5), does not satisfy all members of equation (3).
Thus there is no u(x) in general.
 
Series solutions (including Frobenius' method) are the most general methods of solving linear equations.
 
Rainbow Child said:
You have introduced one function u(x) and you also have n equations in equation (3).

In general your solution for k=0, i.e. equation (5), does not satisfy all members of equation (3).
Thus there is no u(x) in general.

Yeah. I had a feeling it was something like that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Series solutions (including Frobenius' method) are the most general methods of solving linear equations.

Hm. Darn. I don't like using series solutions. They're so cumbersome. Ah, well.

Also, I'm assuming the laplace and Fourier transforms, in general, can't be used to solve linear ODE's with variable coefficients? I know that there are a few specific cases where they work, but, yeah.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K