Solving Marine Acoustics Integral: Integrating 2nd Order ODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luminous Blob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a derivation in marine acoustics related to finding the amplitude along a sound ray as a function of the arc length, s. The original poster presents a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) and expresses uncertainty about the integration process required to derive the amplitude function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss transforming the original equation into a different form that may facilitate integration. There are mentions of using the chain rule and the relationships between the variables involved, such as the sound speed and the Jacobian determinant.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights that suggest alternative forms of the equation, which may help in understanding the integration process. The original poster expresses a growing understanding of the problem, indicating that the discussion is progressing productively.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the book does not provide intermediate steps for the integration, leading to questions about how to handle the dependencies of J, c, and A_0 on the arc length s.

Luminous Blob
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to follow a derivation in a book on marine acoustics for finding the amplitude along a sound ray, as a function of the arc length, s, of the ray.

The book gives the following equation:

[tex] 2\frac{dA_0}{ds}+ \left[ \frac{c}{J}\frac{d}{ds}\left(\frac{J}{c}\right) \right]A_0 = 0[/tex]

The book then says that by integrating the above equation, we get:

[tex] A_0(s)= A_0(0)\left| \frac{c(s)J(0)}{c(0)J(s)} \right|^{1/2}[/tex]

The book doesn't give any intermediate steps, and I'm not really sure how the integration is actually done. I gather that the limits are from 0 to s, but I don't know how you deal with something like this where J, c and A_0 all seem to depend on s.

In these equations, c is the sound speed at a given arc length s along the ray, and J is the Jacobian determinant, given as:

[tex] J = r\left[\frac{dr}{ds}\frac{dz}{d\theta} - \frac{dz}{ds}\frac{dr}{d\theta}\right][/tex]

or alternatively:

[tex] J = r\left[\left(\frac{dz}{d\theta}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dr}{d\theta}\right)^2\right]^{1/2}[/tex]

So...can anyone explain to me the steps involved in going from the first equation to the second? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can get it in the form...

[tex]\frac{2}{A_0}\frac{dA_0}{ds}+\frac{1}{J}\frac{dJ}{ds}+\frac{1}{C}\frac{dC}{ds}=0[/tex]

where [tex]C(s)=1/c(s)[/tex]
 
J77 said:
You can get it in the form...

[tex]\frac{2}{A_0}\frac{dA_0}{ds}+\frac{1}{J}\frac{dJ}{ds}+\frac{1}{C}\frac{dC}{ds}=0[/tex]

where [tex]C(s)=1/c(s)[/tex]

As a follow up to J77's excellent hint, think of chain rule (this is like reversing chain rule).
 
Aah, thanks guys! I see what's happening now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K