Solving Mistake in my Book: (b-a)^2/12

  • Thread starter Thread starter montoyas7940
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Mistake
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical expression involving the equation (b-a)^2/12 and its derivation from (1/3)(b^2+ab+a^2)-(1/4)(b^2+2ab+a^2). Participants identify a potential error regarding an unexplained multiplication by 2 in the intermediate step shown as (b^2-2ab+a^2)/12. Clarification is sought on whether this multiplication is a typographical error, as it is not documented in the errata. Ultimately, it is agreed that the multiplication is indeed a mistake, and the participants decide to move on from the issue. The conversation highlights the importance of accuracy in mathematical texts and the need for clear errata.
montoyas7940
Messages
364
Reaction score
21
(1/3)(b^2+ab+a^2)-(1/4)(b^2+2ab+a^2)

= (b-a)^2
--------
12


I am ok with this but there is am intermediate step shown


(b^2-2ab+a^2)
-------------- (2)
12

I don't see where the multiplication by 2 comes from and it is not shown in the errata.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
montoyas7940 said:
(1/3)(b^2+ab+a^2)-(1/4)(b^2+2ab+a^2)

= (b-a)^2
--------
12


I am ok with this but there is am intermediate step shown


(b^2-2ab+a^2)
-------------- (2)
12

I don't see where the multiplication by 2 comes from and it is not shown in the errata.



You are right that there should be no multiplication by two there.

I am not sure how it exactly appears in your book, but does it appear like you typed it here, with the 2 between parentheses? I am asking because sometimes books number equations and often when equations are numbered, the number is put between parentheses.
 
:smile:
 
It is clearly a multiplication. It is a solution manual for a text and I can't find a published errata. I am just going to assume it is a mistake and move on. Thank you, kdv.
 
montoyas7940 said:
It is clearly a multiplication. It is a solution manual for a text and I can't find a published errata. I am just going to assume it is a mistake and move on. Thank you, kdv.

Ok. Then it is a typo.

You are welcome.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top