Solving Optical Microscopy Issues with Vertical Sidewalls of Deep Trenches

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses challenges in optical microscopy when imaging features near the vertical sidewalls of deep trenches. The main issue is that the trench's top blocks half of the light, preventing proper focus, potentially due to diffraction effects. Suggestions for overcoming this include using a compound microscope with top-down illumination to better access the feature, as well as exploring methods to collimate light effectively. The user notes that the sample is not optically transparent, ruling out transmission illumination. Overall, the focus is on finding suitable imaging techniques to capture details in deep trench features.
phymy8
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem with opticalmicroscopy of features near vertical sidewall of very deep trench

Hi,

I posted my question here:

physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=612780

but there may be more specialists here.

Essentially I have a feature right next to a very deep vertical sidewall of the deep trench. The feature is technically geometrically within line of sight.

The image cannot be focused. I believe it is related to the top part of the trench blocking off half of the light since it is being focused in from the high NA of the objective. Theres also possibly diffraction of light since half the focused light being blocked encounters an edge. Is this it?

How do you overcome this issue? Is there a way to collimate the light at the top of the trench so it directs light uniformly straight down from the top of the trench to the intended feature so light reflects back up to the collimator and re-expanded back to the rest of the microscope? Is there something like dark field imaging? Perhaps cover the other half of the top illumination not contributing to observation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


A stereo microscope may not be the best tool for inspecting a narrow trench. I suggest a compound microscope with the illumination through the lens. You don't mention the dimensions, but in my experience with deep features in the micrometer or tens of micrometers range, the compound microscope allows you to move the focus and observe deep details at various levels.
 


Sorry I did mean compound microscope but top down illumination and not transmission illumination. I may have incorrectly described it as a stereomicroscope.

The sample is not optically transparent so can't use transmission illumination.

I can adjust focus. My problem is I can't get it to focus because of the tall sidewalls.

The sidewall height is close to 1mm while the feature is a couple of microns right by the sidewalls. The NA is around 0.4 so the half angle is quite big.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top