Solving Parlay Payout Formula Deduction

  • Thread starter Thread starter m0j0nz0r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the complexities of calculating parlay payouts in automated wagering tools. Three methods for calculating payouts are identified: fixed odds, true odds, and fixed "true" odds, with the latter presenting a challenge for the user. The user has observed that the payout function exhibits linear characteristics when dealing with positive odds but struggles to derive a formula for fixed odds in relation to the number of games. There is a mention of linear regression as a potential tool for understanding these calculations better. The user expresses a desire for a method to derive formulas from data rather than just receiving answers.
m0j0nz0r
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm currently working on some automated wagering tools. Calculating payouts and such.

However I've hit a little notch which has been eating my brain for the last couple of days.

This notch is the parlay payout function.

By experimenting with some other programs of this nature. I know the following.

There are 3 ways to calculate the payout:

Fixed odds: You multiply the risked amount by the given odd, depending on how many teams are on the parlay.

True odds: You calculate the payout for the first game, the result of that plus the risked amount go as risk on the next game. So on and so forth.

Fixed "True" odds: here's where i have the problem.

I did a graph to know the nature of the function and discovered that it has 2 parts depending on the odds on each game. If the odds are positive (greater than 1:1 ratio) the function shows a linear graph. I've calculated the inclination of the line (1,8973666) but i still can't figure out how is that calculated from the fixed odd (constant 2.6) and the amount of games in the parlay (Constant 2)

I still haven't started to work on the second part of the function which I know (from the graph) that its y/(x1*x2*...*xn) = z (or something of the sort)

Although I would be very happy to have the answer handed to me. It's best if I could learn a method to deduct formulas from a set of data.

I will post more data if requested.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Look up linear regressions.
 
As much as I appreciate a response. It's been 9 years.

I wasn't familiar with linear regression back then. But I am now.

Thanks anyway.
 
m0j0nz0r said:
As much as I appreciate a response. It's been 9 years.

I wasn't familiar with linear regression back then. But I am now.

Thanks anyway.
Yes, I know, but it could help all those who stumble upon this thread.
 
I did not think of that. Thanks.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top